Scholars oppose reintroduction of security decree
Scholars oppose reintroduction of security decree
JAKARTA (JP): Observers criticized as inappropriate and
groundless a motion to reintroduce a People's Consultative
Assembly (MPR) decree that would give a president extra power.
Constitutional law expert Harun Al Rasyid and political
analyst Deliar Noer separately expressed opposition against the
campaign by House of Representatives' legislators to revive the
1988 MPR ruling on preemptive security measures.
"It isn't necessary to legalize the President's authority to
take preemptive security measures through an MPR decree," Harun
told The Jakarta Post yesterday.
"Do they think the country isn't safe for people to live in
anymore?" Deliar said. "What this country needs is ordinary
regulations because its situation is normal."
The decree granted the President the authority to take
preemptive measures against security disturbances and subversive
activities. It was adopted as part of Indonesia's Broad
Guidelines of State Policies in 1988, but was later dropped from
the guidelines in 1993.
The ruling Golkar, the United Development Party (PPP) and the
Indonesian Democratic Party decided recently to include the
substance of the 1988 decree in their drafts of the 1998 state
guidelines.
Harun pointed out that there was a universally accepted
principle that a head of state has emergency power that
authorized him or her to take preemptive security measures.
The decree was first adopted in 1966 and maintained until the
1988 general session of MPR. It formed the basis for the
establishment of the now defunct Kopkamtib (Operational Command
for the Restoration of Security and Order) which, in the 1970s,
was given the task of handling major social and political crises.
The body was not only successful in fulfilling its objectives,
but was also feared.
Harun said the existing Criminal Code and the 1963 Subversion
Law actually had provisions that allowed for such preemptive
measures.
Deliar turned his criticism toward the legislators whom he
said were not independent in their handling of state affairs. He
said legislators might feel inferior before the executive branch
of power, namely the President.
"They should realize that their power is equal to that of the
executive branch," he said.
Some political observers previously expressed concern about
the possible reintroduction of the decree, saying it would give a
president even greater authority than what the Kopkamtib had in
the past.
Separately yesterday, Golkar's secretary-general Ari Mardjono
reaffirmed his organization's support for the reintroduction of
the decree.
"It's necessary to give the President the authority to take
preemptive measures because we will face even greater security
risks and challenges in the future," he said.
He admitted that the call to reintroduce the decree actually
came from President Soeharto when he opened a training course for
legislators last week.
Harun said he suspected that more than a "precautionary
security motive" was behind the reintroduction of the decree.
"The decree was dropped in 1993. Why reintroduce it for next
year's meeting of MPR?" he said.
Deputy chairman of PPP Jusuf Syakir said the 1988 decree was
dropped in 1993 because none of the five factions in MPR
requested its reintroduction.
He said PPP would bring the issue up at a party meeting soon.
(imn/amd)