Reversing the burden of proof

Reversing the burden of proof

From Rakyat Merdeka

Corruption, collusion and nepotism (KKN) is an issue that
calls for urgent resolution. Whether you realize it or not, these
issues are increasingly destroying many aspects of life in our
nation.

What would happen if a senior official placed his family
members or relatives in a company? It would likely develop into
corrupt, collusive and nepotistic practices.

As long as our legal system remains unchanged, we cannot
expect the situation to improve much. The public has suggested
many ideas about how to eradicate the practices but the
government has not been quick enough to respond. The officials
concerned are obviously afraid that their corruption cases will
be exposed.

Reversing the burden of proof, one of the suggestions made by
the community, is still effective in some developed countries.

To apply such a principle would not be burdensome in terms of
cost and energy. Simply carry out site checks and ask a
government official to explain the source of his wealth.
Moreover, the public servant's Wealth Audit Commission can offer
a solution. From here we can learn whether or not the official
has received his wealth by fair means.

A senior official, who does not run a business or does not
come from a wealthy family background and whose wealth does not
originate from his salary or an inheritance, should be seriously
investigated for the funds received in relation to his position.

Look at the following example. An official, whose monthly
salary is about Rp 20 million, will only be able to save Rp 720
million in three years. In reality, he owns a luxury house worth
over Rp 1 billion and three or four expensive cars. Where did he
get all these things? Cases such as these abound in the country.

Those who do not agree with the application of reversing the
burden of proof should therefore be suspected.

SOEJOEDONO R

Jakarta