Reversing the burden of proof

Reversing the burden of proof

From Rakyat Merdeka

Corruption, collusion and nepotism (KKN) is an issue that calls for urgent resolution. Whether you realize it or not, these issues are increasingly destroying many aspects of life in our nation.

What would happen if a senior official placed his family members or relatives in a company? It would likely develop into corrupt, collusive and nepotistic practices.

As long as our legal system remains unchanged, we cannot expect the situation to improve much. The public has suggested many ideas about how to eradicate the practices but the government has not been quick enough to respond. The officials concerned are obviously afraid that their corruption cases will be exposed.

Reversing the burden of proof, one of the suggestions made by the community, is still effective in some developed countries.

To apply such a principle would not be burdensome in terms of cost and energy. Simply carry out site checks and ask a government official to explain the source of his wealth. Moreover, the public servant's Wealth Audit Commission can offer a solution. From here we can learn whether or not the official has received his wealth by fair means.

A senior official, who does not run a business or does not come from a wealthy family background and whose wealth does not originate from his salary or an inheritance, should be seriously investigated for the funds received in relation to his position.

Look at the following example. An official, whose monthly salary is about Rp 20 million, will only be able to save Rp 720 million in three years. In reality, he owns a luxury house worth over Rp 1 billion and three or four expensive cars. Where did he get all these things? Cases such as these abound in the country.

Those who do not agree with the application of reversing the burden of proof should therefore be suspected.

SOEJOEDONO R

Jakarta