Putri Zulkifli Hasan Faces Forced Eviction After Second Execution Warning
A luxury house occupied by Putri Zulkifli Hasan, the Deputy Chair of Commission XII of the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI) and daughter of Coordinating Minister for Food Zulkifli Hasan, is under threat of forced repossession by court bailiffs. This step looms over Putri after she once again failed to appear without reason for a second execution warning (aanmaning) at the East Jakarta District Court (PN Jaktim).
The disputed object is a plot of land and a grand building covering 1,483 square metres in the Nusa Indah Raya area of Cipinang Muara, Jatinegara, East Jakarta. This execution follows a Supreme Court (MA) ruling in favour of the execution applicant, Aziz Anugerah Yudha Prawira and associates.
‘Today was the second execution warning, but Putri Zulkifli Hasan did not attend again, or was absent without a clear reason,’ said the applicant’s legal counsel, Yayan Riyanto, in a statement on Thursday (4/6/2026).
Yayan explained that the absence of Putri, as Respondent III, and her legal team led the Head of the East Jakarta District Court to declare the execution warning process complete. Under procedural law, the court provides a short deadline for a voluntary vacation of the property.
If the house, which is also reportedly occupied by Zulkifli Hasan, is not vacated within the next eight days, the applicant will immediately file a request for a physical execution or forced eviction. ‘Subsequently, the second execution warning was declared complete by the Head of the East Jakarta District Court, and an eight-day wait is in place to file the application for forced eviction,’ Yayan stressed.
Yayan also expressed regret over Putri’s attitude, given her current status as a high-ranking state official. Although Putri is currently pursuing a judicial review (PK) at the Supreme Court, Yayan emphasised that, by law, a PK filing cannot postpone or halt an execution that has gained permanent legal force (inkrah). ‘As a state official, Putri Zulkifli Hasan is not setting a good example, never having attended despite being properly summoned by the court,’ Yayan lamented.
The dispute over the asset, valued at Rp30 billion, began in September 2020. At that time, Applicant I, Aziz Anugerah Yudha Prawira, needed a cash loan and was introduced to Gianda Pranata (Respondent II). The initial agreement stipulated a loan of Rp5.5 billion, secured against a Certificate of Ownership (SHM) registered under Binar Imammi (Applicant II). After deductions for interest and commission, the funds disbursed amounted to only Rp1.7 billion.
However, before a notary with the initials Syafran (Respondent IV), Aziz was forced to sign a Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB) and a Power of Attorney to Sell, under the pretext that this was merely a formality. Irregularities began to surface when Aziz attempted to repay his loan. The lender, Lie Andry Setyadarma (Respondent I), cut off communication and claimed to have legally purchased the house. Unbeknownst to the original owner, the property’s certificate was directly transferred in name at the East Jakarta Land Office.
Amidst the ongoing legal dispute and a report to the Criminal Investigation Agency (Bareskrim) of the National Police in November 2021, ownership of the disputed asset was suddenly transferred from Lie Andry (Respondent I) to Putri Zulkifli Hasan (Respondent III). The house was then completely renovated and has been occupied by Putri ever since.
Aziz and his associates’ long struggle bore fruit after the Supreme Court issued Cassation Ruling Number 3812 K/Pdt/2025 on 22 October 2025, declaring the actions of the respondents as unlawful. This ruling now serves as the legal basis for the East Jakarta District Court, under execution application number 21/Pdt.Eks/2026/PN Jkt.Tim, to promptly vacate the asset.