MUI slammed over controversial fatwas

MUI slammed over controversial fatwas

Hera Diani and Slamet Susanto, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta, Yogyakarta

More condemnation has been heaped on the Indonesian Ulema Council
(MUI) for issuing draconian fatwas outlawing liberal Islamic
thought and pluralism, raising the question as to whether the
Council should be dissolved.

Scholars and activists grouped in the Democratic Education
Association (P2D) issued a joint statement on Monday condemning
the MUI for undermining the principles of nationhood and
democracy.

Read by lawyer/human rights activist Todung Mulya Lubis, the
Association criticized the fatwas as unconstitutional, and as
hampering nation-building efforts in this country.

"Our constitution is not perfect and it still needs further
amendment. But it is supported by all of society, so it cannot be
undermined or negated," Todung told a media conference, which was
also attended by Muslim scholars Azyumardi Azra, Siti Musdah
Mulia, Hasyim Wahid and Ulil Abshar Abdalla, as well as democracy
activist Smita Notosusanto.

The MUI concluded a four-day national congress last Friday
with the issuing of 11 edicts, one of which stipulates that Islamic
interpretations based on liberalism, secularism and pluralism
"contradict Islamic teachings."

Another fatwa renewed the ban on the Ahmadiyah sect, and asked
the government to take action against the group. The earlier
Ahmadiyah fatwa has been blamed for justifying the attack on an
Ahmadiyah congregation by Muslim extremists last month.

The Democratic Education Association said that pluralism was a
fact of life and was supported by the founding fathers when
establishing the Republic. The fatwas showed that the MUI was out
of line with the development of democracy, which requires
pluralism and the protection of citizens rights.

"The issuance of the fatwas shows how weak the concepts of
nationhood and democracy are in this country. We would urge the
government to uphold these concepts by protecting and
guaranteeing people's constitutional rights," said the statement.

The association also urged President Susilo Bambang
Yudhoyono's administration to be proactive in maintaining
pluralism instead of bowing to the fatwas.

Azyumardi said that the fatwas had the potential to divide not
only Muslim from non-Muslim, but also Muslims themselves.

"The fatwas are not in line with the principles of Islam, which
promotes tolerance and peaceful dialog with people of differing
views," he said.

Azyumardi then urged the MUI to hold an open discussion with
people from different fields of expertise, not only Islamic
jurisprudence.

"The government must not give in to the demands of certain
groups, which might use these fatwas to attack other groups. If
the government doesn't do anything about this, it would set a bad
precedent and be very dangerous."

As the implications of the fatwas were huge, the scholars
urged the government to discuss these matters with the MUI with a
view to resolving the issue.

They also urged the MUI to reform itself, and involve people
of differing views instead of only conservative mullahs.

"The ideal job for the MUI, if people still want it to exist,
is to promote dialog between Muslims themselves, as well as with
other groups," Ulil said.

Meanwhile, National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM)
member M. Bilah, who chairs the investigation into the recent
attack on an Ahmadiyah congregation in Bogor, said the
constituted a violation of human rights.