Learning from the Depok Case: Why Must Road Users Prioritise Ambulances?

DEPOK, KOMPAS.com - The case of a motorcyclist blocking an ambulance in Depok has drawn public attention and reignited discussions on the importance of prioritising emergency vehicles on public roads.

The incident occurred on Jalan Moch Nail, Bakti Jaya Ward, Sukmajaya District, Depok City, on Sunday (10/5/2026).

The ambulance, heading to an accident location, was obstructed by a motorcyclist with initials ML, who claimed the siren’s sound was disturbing.

Police have designated ML as a suspect after he allegedly kicked the ambulance, causing damage to its bumper.

The case serves as a reminder that ambulances are among the vehicles with primary rights on the road and must be prioritised by other road users.

The obligation to prioritise certain vehicles is already regulated under Law No. 22 of 2009 on Road Traffic and Transportation.

Article 134 specifies that road users with primary priority rights, in order, include firefighting vehicles on duty, ambulances transporting the sick, vehicles for traffic accident assistance, vehicles for state institution leaders and state guests, and funeral processions.

Additionally, certain vehicles may receive priority based on police officers’ considerations.

Meanwhile, Article 135 paragraph 1 stipulates that priority vehicles must be escorted by police officers and/or use signal lights and sirens while on duty.

Amid the viral Depok case, questions have arisen regarding ambulances not carrying patients.

By regulation, an empty ambulance can still receive priority if it is en route to a patient, carrying medical equipment, or performing other emergency duties.

The legal basis refers to Article 134 letter g, concerning vehicles for specific interests according to police officers’ considerations.

However, the use of priority facilities must not be abused. Ambulance drivers must be accountable for using sirens and primary road rights.