KPK Urges Public to Be Wary of Social Media Opinions on Corruption Cases
The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has highlighted the phenomenon of public support for suspects in corruption cases on social media, urging the public not to readily believe opinions circulated online.
“Regarding the phenomenon of mutual support on social media and in news coverage, this phenomenon does exist. It is not only related to cases handled by the KPK, but also cases handled by other law enforcement agencies. So there are attempts to shape public opinion regarding the suspect and the case itself,” said Asep Guntur Rahayu, KPK’s Deputy for Prosecution and Execution, to journalists on Wednesday (11 March 2026).
Asep noted that such support typically occurs for suspects who are public figures. He acknowledged concerns about the public being influenced by narratives shared on social media without detailed knowledge of ongoing cases.
“Often the public becomes influenced when information, views, or opinions are conveyed by public figures. What we are concerned about is when such opinions are shared by public figures without them having received comprehensive information from us,” Asep explained.
Asep further clarified that during the investigation phase of a case, investigators cannot disclose detailed information about case handling, as certain information can only be revealed during court proceedings.
“Investigators will not provide information related to materials that will only be disclosed during trial proceedings,” he stated.
Asep expressed hope that the public would be more discerning and prudent when receiving narratives from social media regarding case handling, particularly in corruption offences. He also urged the public to await the facts that will emerge during trial.
“So we appeal to the public: be careful in processing information from anyone. Let the information be revealed during trial proceedings. Because during trial, both investigators and defendants will present information and evidence,” Asep said.
“That is where the evidence possessed by law enforcement officials will be compared with the evidence possessed by the defendants,” he added.