Difference of opinions

Difference of opinions

We have often read in the media sharp differences of opinions
concerning various issues. In spite of the differences, each
opinion refers to the substance and values of Pancasila and the
1945 Constitution.

For example, the appointments of members of the House of
Representatives. All opinions claim to have been based on
Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. But, if we study the matter,
we will find that the interpretation of the bureaucracy, on the
issue, is considerably different from that of Gen. (ret)
Nasution.

Again an article in a magazine says: Everything concerning
Mandatory--the election system, responsibility, and rights--has
been stipulated in the Constitution. However, in the meantime, a
scholar says that a law is needed for regulating the presidential
institution, in the same way as a law for political parties, in
supplement to the articles in the Constitution. Also, sometimes,
a decision of the People's Consultative Assembly is necessary to
complement the relevant article in the Constitution.

According to Gen. (ret) Sumitro, the implementation of
democracy is hampered because of different interpretations of
several articles in the 1945 Constitution.

Based on the above problems, I would like to suggest that all
parties do away with individual or group interest, and stick only
to the interest of the society as a whole. This is important so
that succeeding generations will not be doubtful in maintaining
the unity and integrity of the nation.

EDDY JUSUF

Jakarta