Difference of opinions

Difference of opinions

We have often read in the media sharp differences of opinions concerning various issues. In spite of the differences, each opinion refers to the substance and values of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution.

For example, the appointments of members of the House of Representatives. All opinions claim to have been based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. But, if we study the matter, we will find that the interpretation of the bureaucracy, on the issue, is considerably different from that of Gen. (ret) Nasution.

Again an article in a magazine says: Everything concerning Mandatory--the election system, responsibility, and rights--has been stipulated in the Constitution. However, in the meantime, a scholar says that a law is needed for regulating the presidential institution, in the same way as a law for political parties, in supplement to the articles in the Constitution. Also, sometimes, a decision of the People's Consultative Assembly is necessary to complement the relevant article in the Constitution.

According to Gen. (ret) Sumitro, the implementation of democracy is hampered because of different interpretations of several articles in the 1945 Constitution.

Based on the above problems, I would like to suggest that all parties do away with individual or group interest, and stick only to the interest of the society as a whole. This is important so that succeeding generations will not be doubtful in maintaining the unity and integrity of the nation.

EDDY JUSUF

Jakarta