Constitutional Court to Decide on 22 Judicial Review Petitions Today

Jakarta - The Constitutional Court (MK) has scheduled the pronouncement of decisions on 22 petitions for material examination or judicial review of laws submitted by various petitioners for today, Tuesday. Observations from ANTARA on the MK’s official website indicate that the pronouncement of decisions or determinations is scheduled to begin at 14:00 WIB and continue until completion. The 22 cases to be decided today consist of three cases on the judicial review of the new Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), two cases on the Civil Service Law (ASN), two cases on the Election Law, two cases on the Job Creation Law, one case on the Criminal Code (KUHP), one case on the 2026 State Budget Law (APBN), and one case on the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE). Several cases drawing attention include the judicial reviews of the KUHP and the new KUHAP, which have seen numerous petitions to the MK. For today’s decisions, case number 96/PUU-XXIV/2026 involves the judicial review of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the KUHP, petitioned by Ngarijan Salim. The petitioner challenges the phrases “benefiting oneself or others or a corporation” and “enriching oneself or others or a corporation” as well as “harming state finances or the national economy,” arguing that they will still encourage law enforcement to treat Articles 603 and 604 as catch-all provisions. Case number 127/PUU-XXIV/2026 concerns the judicial review of Law Number 17 of 2025 on the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBN) for Fiscal Year 2026, submitted by petitioner Edy Rudyanto, questioning special allocation funds (DAK). Meanwhile, the MK will continue its session on Tuesday (12/5) morning starting at 10:30 WIB with the agenda of improving petitions for case number 143/PUU-XXIV/2026 on the judicial review of Law Number 24 of 2000 on International Treaties, petitioned by Tresno Subagyo. Additionally, case number 142/PUU-XXIV/2026 on the judicial review of Law Number 17 of 2025 on the APBN for Fiscal Year 2026, petitioned by Inggret Adu, and case number 141/PUU-XXIV/2026 on the judicial review of Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, petitioned by Livia Maulina. The MK is also holding hearings to listen to testimonies from the DPR and the president for three cases: case number 123/PUU-XXIV/2026 on the judicial review of Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection; case number 110/PUU-XXIV/2026 on the judicial review of Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection and Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health; and case number 86/PUU-XXIV/2026 on the judicial review of Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. The following is the list of 22 cases to be decided today: - Case number 127/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 17 of 2025 on the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBN) for Fiscal Year 2026, submitted by petitioner H. Edy Rudyanto. - Case number 119/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code, petitioned by Syamsul Jahidin. - Case number 111/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code, petitioned by Ruben Yosafat Tampubolon. - Case number 118/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code, petitioned by Harribertus Satori Nabit. - Case number 124/PUU/XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 7 of 2017 on Elections and similar regulations regarding educational requirements for legislative positions, petitioned by Ardi Usman. - Case number 109/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 7 of 2017 on Elections, petitioned by M. Havidz Aima. - Case number 122/PUU/XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 20 of 2023 on Civil Servants, petitioned by Kusdian. - Case number 120/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 20 of 2023 on Civil Servants, petitioned by Ifsan Massa Kareundeng. - Case number 116/PUU/XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 11 of 2008 on ITE, petitioned by Ferdinandus Klau. - Case number 90/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 6 of 2023 on the Enactment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation into Law, petitioned by Linawati. - Case number 87/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 6 of 2023 Enactment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation into Law, petitioned by Rachmad Rofik. - Case number 95/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 10 of 2016 amending Law Number 1 of 2015 on the Enactment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2014 on the Election of Governors, Regents, and Mayors into Law, petitioned by Frans Pekey. - Case number 71/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 3 of 2022 on the State Capital as amended by Law Number 21 of 2023 amending Law Number 3 of 2022 on the State Capital. - Case number 96/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, petitioned by Ngarijan Salim. - Case number 113/PUU/XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 7 of 1989 on Religious Courts as last amended by Law Number 50 of 2009 amending Law Number 7 of 1989 on Religious Courts, petitioned by Marlinda. - Case number 131/PUU/XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, petitioned by Annisa Susinta. - Case number 38/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review of Law Number 151 of 2024 amending Law Number 2 of 2024 on the Special Region of Jakarta Province, petitioned by Astro Alfa Licecharlie. - Case number 60/PUU-XXIV/2026 judicial review