Australia-Indonesia relations lack leadership

Australia-Indonesia relations lack leadership

Duncan Graham, Contributor, Surabaya

The Australian government has failed to provide serious
leadership in improving relations with Indonesia, according to
Dr. David Hill, professor of Southeast Asian Studies at Western
Australia's Murdoch University.

"It is disappointing that many key recommendations made by a
Federal Parliamentary committee -- and central to Australia's
future capacity to engage with Indonesia in a mutually beneficial
and productive way -- have not been taken up with sufficient
vigor or commitment," he told The Jakarta Post.

Prof. Hill was commenting on the Australian government's
response to a major report on Australian-Indonesian relations.

The report was written by the foreign affairs sub-committee of
the Australian Parliament's Joint Standing Committee on Foreign
Affairs, Defense and Trade.

The 275-page report with 28 recommendations was published in
May last year, but the government's response has only just been
released.

The report, titled Near Neighbours - Good Neighbours, took 21
months to produce. Work started following the 2002 Bali bombings.

The 25-member sub-committee met in Australia and Jakarta. It
included members of parliament from all major Australian
political parties. The current Opposition Leader Kim Beazley was
a member.

Input was given by 60 organizations and 124 submissions were
made. Almost 40 percent concerned education.

In the report sub-committee chairman David Jull described the
Indonesian-Australian relationship as "complex".

"Being good neighbours is an art requiring a delicate
balancing of distance and closeness," he said. "A distance that
is respectful of difference and sovereignty -- a closeness that
guarantees a helping hand in time of need."

Although the report drew a lukewarm response in Australia,
most academics involved in Asian Studies welcomed recommendations
that urged the government to spend more on education to boost
understanding of Indonesia.

In its reply to the report, the government said funding for
education and training assistance to Indonesia had increased.
Scholarships were available and a new program had been introduced
to lift English language training in Islamic boarding schools,
mainly in East Java.

However Professor Hill slammed the government's negative
response to a recommendation to restore the National Asian
Languages and Studies in Australian Schools program.

This started in 1995 and was designed to make Australians more
Asia-literate. Teachers claimed the program helped revive
interest in Indonesian, but the Federal government withdrew
support in 2002. Enrollments in higher level learning of
Indonesian then slumped.

"While the uptake of Indonesian language languishes around
Australia the government's response is simply to declare that it
is doing what it can -- which is clearly not enough," Prof. Hill
said.

"Indonesian needs to be regarded as a strategic priority and
to be supported financially at all levels of education from
primary to tertiary.

"Yet the level of funding is less than A$1.50 (Rp 11,000) a
year per head of population which is a paltry investment in a
country's linguistic competence. It's less than the cost of one
cup of coffee.

"Instead of providing serious leadership, the government has
chosen to deflect responsibility back to the various states."

Responding to another recommendation that the government lift
its aid to Indonesia, the government said that before last
December's tsunami Australia had already increased its annual aid
budget to A$160.8 million (Rp 120,75 million).

After the Indian Ocean disaster and a commitment of A$1
billion (Rp 7,5 billion) over five years, Australia is now the
third ranked bilateral donor to Indonesia behind Japan and
Germany.

Another recommendation for action to promote understanding of
Islam in Australia drew this response: "The government is
currently looking at ways to address the perceptions in some
areas of the community that Australia is not racially or
religiously tolerant".

== ibox

For more of the report from the Australian Parliament's Joint
Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade, go to:
http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/jfadt/index.htm