War in Aceh
War in Aceh
Peace talks between the Indonesian government and separatist
rebels from Aceh province held in Tokyo broke off Sunday with no
agreement. Within hours, Indonesia's President Megawati
Soekarnoputri declared effective martial law in Aceh and ordered
an army assault on the Free Aceh Movement, the pro-independence
rebel group, known locally as GAM.
Indonesia is a multicultural, multiracial nation of many
religions and languages. It is not hard to understand why the
Megawati government was so quick to crack down on any separatist
movement. But history shows this problem cannot be solved solely
by military force.
GAM also needs to back away from insisting it will never stop
its pursuit for independence, no matter how long it takes. No
nation in the world would support a revival of the Aceh Kingdom.
Most people in the region prefer a peaceful and quiet life above
all.
Although the peace negotiations in Tokyo failed, Japan holds
some leverage with Indonesia as its largest aid donor. The
government should press Indonesia and other concerned nations to
try harder to bring the two sides back to the negotiating table
as soon as possible.
-- Asahi Shimbun, Tokyo
Fight against terrorism
While terrorism spreads carnage throughout the world, feeding
the demand for public security "at every cost," the European
Union is indicating that the protection of personal information
is a fundamental right of its citizens. Security and privacy seem
to inhabit two separate, distant worlds.
Are privacy rights really in conflict with security rights?
Defending individual privacy isn't necessarily a limitation; it's
an opportunity. More privacy can mean more security. The
protection of data as innocuous as airline passenger lists, for
example, can be crucial. ...
The protection of personal data must be addressed through
precise regulation, as a type of habeas corpus for citizens of
the third millennia. If one opts to sacrifice his right to
privacy on the altar of security, there should be measures in
place to protect his personal information. Those who compile
private data must be held accountable. They must explain what the
data is for, who it's for, and for how long it will be kept on
file.
-- Corriere Della Sera, Milan, Italy
GlaxoSmithKline's
chief executive KALAU NGGAK TERPAKSA JANGAN DIPAKAI
Finally someone has rebelled against rewarding failure.
GlaxoSmithKline's chief executive, Jean-Pierre Garnier, should
never have been in line for tens of millions of pounds if he had
lost his job. Trade unionists, the public and politicians were
angry about the insouciance and arrogance of a boardroom deaf to
their pleas for wage restraint. ... Shareholders in Europe's
biggest drug company voted against the proposed pay deal - a
first in British corporate history. The detachment of managerial
rewards from economic reality is to blame for this. While share
prices and profits fall and the pall of financial bad news hangs
over the stock market, executives in the top FTSE-100 companies
trousered pay increases of 23 percent in the last quarter.
Watching directors' salaries rise as jobs are cut and wealth is
destroyed rather than created is indefensible and immoral. But it
is not illegal - yet. ...
Executives should make do with much less - a three-month
notice period sounds right. Their contracts should be put to a
shareholders' vote. Pay-offs, too, need to be linked to
performance. The size of bosses' pensions, which expand as fast
as their employees' shrink, requires urgent attention. Those
managers who often view their vice as virtue claim that without
such incentives entrepreneurs would not take risks. But the only
risks being taken are with share prices, which fund our pensions.
The notion that globalization sees Wall Street salaries in the
Square Mile is also bogus. It should be innovation and success -
difficult quantities to measure -- that merit pay rises, not the
fact that a company's interests span borders. Even then riches
should be shared. Too often the only beneficiaries of a
successful business are its executives. The disparity between
boardroom and shopfloor wages is now too large to justify. We
have to accept that market states produce income inequality. That
is why governments must act. Unrestrained greed is not a proper
basis for society. ...
The Guardian, London