UN Exposes a Major Lie Indonesians Need to Know
Jakarta, CNBC Indonesia — The United Nations (UN) has warned that developments in artificial intelligence (AI) could widen the digital divide between countries.
AI was one of the main topics at the United Nations General Assembly in New York in September 2026. Countries generally acknowledged AI’s considerable potential, but have yet to agree on how to manage its risks and share the benefits of the technology fairly.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres acknowledged that AI could bring about major changes in people’s lives, from healthcare to scientific research.
“AI is indeed a game-changer, with enormous potential to advance medicine, accelerate scientific discovery, expand opportunities and improve lives,” Guterres said, as quoted by UN News on Monday (12 October 2026).
The UN, however, has stressed the importance of balancing the promotion of innovation with stronger oversight. Without adequate safeguards, AI development risks causing job losses, deepening the digital divide between developed and developing countries such as Indonesia, and creating opportunities for the technology to be misused.
UN General Assembly President Khalilur Rahman said the world must not stifle innovation, but must still put rules in place to anticipate AI’s negative impacts.
“AI can be a powerful accelerator of human progress; therefore, we must not close the door to innovation,” Rahman said.
Countries have also outlined differing approaches to managing AI development. Switzerland emphasised the importance of regulation that can build trust without hindering the benefits of technology. Japan called for co-operation to ensure the safety of advanced AI, while Saudi Arabia highlighted ethical considerations and responsible use.
Singapore has also advocated testing technology, building trust and reporting incidents across borders. It warned of risks as AI systems become increasingly capable of operating autonomously.
Guterres said the main problem lies not in the technology itself, but in weak accountability and oversight of its use.
“The danger is not technology. The danger is technology without accountability, capability without oversight, decision-making without transparency,” he concluded.