UN Exposes a Major AI Myth Indonesians Should Know About

Jakarta, CNBC Indonesia — The United Nations (UN) has highlighted the threat that artificial intelligence (AI) could widen the digital divide between developed and developing countries.

AI developments were in focus at the UN General Assembly in New York in September 2026. Although many countries regard AI as a promising technology, differences remain over how to oversee its risks and ensure its benefits are shared equitably.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres said AI had the potential to transform many aspects of human life, including improving healthcare and advancing scientific research.

“AI is indeed a game-changer, with enormous potential to advance medicine, accelerate scientific discovery, expand opportunities and improve lives,” Guterres said, according to UN News on Friday (23 October 2026).

The UN, however, stressed the importance of balancing support for innovation with stronger oversight. Without adequate safeguards, AI development could lead to job losses, deepen the digital divide between developed and developing countries such as Indonesia, and create opportunities for the technology to be misused.

UN General Assembly President Khalilur Rahman said the world should not stifle innovation, but must put rules in place to anticipate AI’s negative effects.

“AI can be a powerful accelerator of human progress; therefore, we must not close the door to innovation,” Rahman said.

Several countries also outlined different approaches to managing AI development. Switzerland emphasised the importance of regulation that builds trust without undermining the technology’s benefits. Japan called for cooperation to ensure the safety of advanced AI, while Saudi Arabia highlighted ethics and responsible use.

Singapore also advocated testing the technology, building trust and reporting incidents across borders. It warned of risks arising as AI systems become increasingly capable of operating autonomously.

Guterres said the main problem was not the technology itself, but the lack of accountability and oversight over its use.

“The danger is not technology. The danger is technology without accountability, capability without oversight, and decision-making without transparency,” he concluded.