Sustaining reform spirit
Sustaining reform spirit
With the students evicted, the clamor at the House of
Representatives (DPR) complex has subsided. But the flame of
total reform continues to burn everywhere.
Within the House, though, the reformist spirit appears to have
diminished. Home Minister Syarwan Hamid, who has yet to let go of
his job as vice-chairman of the House and the People's
Consultative Assembly (MPR), and Hamzah Haz, one of three House
members now occupying a ministerial post, agree that a MPR
extraordinary session should be held, but uniquely -- not to say
strangely -- only for the purpose of electing a vice president.
Some of those who called for total reform before also seem to
be slowing down. These people feel that their respective groups,
or interests, have been accommodated by the present Reform and
Development Cabinet. They would like to see President B.J.
Habibie continue to lead the current cabinet until 2003.
On the other hand, campus activists, academics and all those
who see themselves as true reformists regard the shift of power
from Soeharto to Habibie as merely a first step. The next step
should be the holding of a special session of the MPR for the
purpose of electing a new president and vice president.
Constitutional lawyer Prof. Dr. Sri Sumantri goes even further
and suggests that all appointed Assembly members be replaced
before a special session is held.
In the cabinet itself, Coordinating Minister of Economy,
Finance and Industry Ginandjar Kartasasmita and other economic
ministers have explicitly expressed their agreement with those
who want total reform. They have expressed their willingness to
serve as ministers for a number of months, but not for five
years. This means that they see themselves as members of a
transitional cabinet and support the idea of speeding up
elections.
What we see in this is differing perceptions about reform. On
one side are those who continue to demand total reform which
would lead to an overall renewal, including of the national
legislature. On the other side, we see some people whose reform
spirit has slackened due to practical considerations and vested
interests. The sad thing is that efforts have become apparent to
reduce the prevailing reformist spirit by using the banners of
religion, an issue which we all hold sacred.
This is a drift we must beware of lest the reform movement
ends in an exhibition of empty rhetoric, or worse, becomes an
instrument to serve certain particular interests. The reformist
spirit and stamina of our reform activists must be sustained and
guarded -- or else they may be swallowed up in the mode of
thinking of those with established interests.
-- Media Indonesia, Jakarta