Indonesian Political, Business & Finance News

Prosecutor Febrie Adriansyah Temporarily Dismissed from Position

| | Source: MEDIA_INDONESIA Translated from Indonesian | Legal
Prosecutor Febrie Adriansyah Temporarily Dismissed from Position
Image: MEDIA_INDONESIA

Attorney General ST Burhanuddin has officially suspended former Junior Attorney General for Special Crimes (Jampidsus) Febrie Adriansyah from his prosecutorial duties. The decision follows Adriansyah’s designation as a suspect in an alleged money laundering case (TPPU).

Head of the Attorney General’s Office Legal Information Centre, Anang Supriatna, confirmed the suspension took effect on 31 July 2026. The measure is intended to allow the legal process to reach a final and binding verdict, or inkracht.

“Correct, currently Mr FA (Febrie Adriansyah) has been temporarily suspended pending a final and binding decision. The Attorney General made the suspension,” Anang stated in Jakarta on Tuesday (4/8).

Anang explained that the temporary suspension mechanism follows a report from a special investigative team at the Attorney General’s Office, known as Team 9. The team named Febriezan Adriansyah alongside a private party, Nurman Herin, as suspects in a money laundering case with predicate corruption offences.

Prior to the suspect designation, Febrie Adriansyah had submitted a letter of resignation from his position as Junior Attorney General for Special Crimes on 11 July 2026. The resignation was claimed to demonstrate a commitment to maintaining integrity, objectivity, and neutrality in the ongoing legal process.

In addition to the money laundering case, Adriansyah’s earlier resignation was also linked to the transfer of a corruption case from the Indonesian National Police to the Attorney General’s Office. The legal proceedings against the former high-ranking official within the Adhyaksa Corps are now under public scrutiny.

Responding to the legal action, Adriansyah’s camp has stated it will not remain silent. His legal team plans to file a pre-trial motion to challenge the legality of the coercive measures and the suspect designation made by the Attorney General’s Office investigators.

View JSON | Print