Presenting Conclusions, Febrie's Camp Claims 40 Regulations Were Violated
The legal team of former Junior Attorney General for Special Crimes, Febrie Adriansyah, claims that 40 regulations were violated in the money laundering case involving 74 kilograms of gold and Rp543 billion in cash.
Febrie’s lawyer, Febri Diansyah, said the findings were submitted in a concluding document to the sole pretrial judge at the South Jakarta District Court on Monday (24/8).
He stated that the 40 violated provisions range from Constitutional Court rulings, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Code, the Money Laundering Law, the Government Administration Law, the Prosecution Service Law, to internal regulations of law enforcement agencies.
“Not just one or two, but 40 statutory regulations. Including Constitutional Court rulings, both the consideration sections and the operative parts of the rulings,” he said.
Furthermore, Febri claimed that from the five coercive measures that are the object of the pretrial motion, his team also found 30 alleged violations of procedural law and the principle of due process of law.
He added that the examination in the pretrial hearing focuses on procedural aspects, not the substance of the main case. The pretrial motion therefore aims to correct the process and procedures of law enforcement so that they are carried out properly.
According to him, if the judge grants the pretrial motion, it does not automatically eliminate the main case. The ruling will only test the validity of the actions or legal procedures carried out by law enforcement officers.
“What is annulled or declared invalid is the procedure. There will still be an opportunity after this ruling for law enforcement to improve the way they handle the main case,” said Febri.
He considered the matter important because his client, a former senior official at the Attorney General’s Office, could be processed in a manner deemed to violate many provisions. Similar problems could potentially befall other citizens.
“If a Jampidsus can be subjected to a legal process that is forced or violates up to 40 regulations or provisions, then this is certainly dangerous if it is not corrected,” he said.
“Many parties could become victims. That is why the basic principle we want to bring and fight for is not merely a procedural issue, but something far more fundamental than that,” he added.
Previously, Febrie asked the sole judge of the South Jakarta District Court to annul the detention carried out by the Attorney General’s Office.
This was conveyed by Febrie in the petition of the pretrial motion filed with the South Jakarta District Court. Febrie also asked the judge to declare the detention order invalid and without binding legal force.
In the petition, Febrie challenged Detention Order Number PRIN-43/F/Fd.2/07/2026 dated 24 July 2026 issued against Febrie. The legal counsel asked the judge to declare the detention order invalid along with all its legal consequences.