NJOP preferred in state assets assessment

NJOP preferred in state assets assessment

The Jakarta Post, Jakarta

The government is starting to consider a plan to use the official
taxable property value (NJOP), instead of the current market
price to reassess state assets scattered across the country.

The Ministry of Finance's Director for the Management of State
Assets Herry Purnomo said financial and time constraints were
behind the government's consideration for the new assessment
procedure.

"If the government hires independent appraisers to assess
state assets, it will be very expensive and take years to
complete," he said in a seminar on Tuesday.

Herry explained that the government would benefit by using the
NJOP price data, which is readily available, as it would be more
expedient in getting an accurate picture of the proper value of
its assets, some of which were last valued up to 30 years ago.

The government's 2004 financial report -- submitted to the
Supreme Audit Agency -- put the price of some state assets at Rp
1 each.

Economist Iman Sugema of the Bogor Institute of Agriculture
said that using the taxable value was preferable to the current
system -- which nominally valued some assets, such as land,
irrigation and bridges at Rp 1 to enable them to be accounted for
as state inventory.

However, he said, the government should start using
independent appraisers to get a truer sense of the market value
of its assets.

"Valuing the assets below their market price is very dangerous
because it leaves room for improperly selling them at a cheap
prices," said Sugema, adding that the data for the NJOP was
updated only once every five years.

Emmy Hafild of Transparency International concurred with
Sugema, saying that using the taxable value was still not good
enough as it was normally lower than the actual market value of
the asset.

"The government will not benefit because the price stated in
the NJOP is lower than the market price," she said. "Even banks
conduct independent surveys and use the market value, why can't
the government?" (002)