Indonesian Political, Business & Finance News

Lawyer named winner of rights award

| Source: JP

Lawyer named winner of rights award

JAKARTA (JP): A Surabaya-based lawyer known for his handling
of numerous controversial cases pitting him against the
government was named this year's recipient of the Yap Thiam Hien
human rights award.

The Foundation of the Center for the Study of Human Rights
(Yapusham) announced yesterday that this year's award goes to
Trimoelya D. Soerjadi.

Trimoelya rose to prominence for the way he defended a company
director accused of masterminding the killing of labor activist
Marsinah last year. Although Judi Susanto, his client and also
owner of watch making factor PT Catur Putra Surya in Surabaya,
was convicted at the district court and sentenced to 17 years in
jail, he won an appeal to the High Court for his acquittal.

Under the chairmanship of human rights lawyer Todung Mulya
Lubis, Yapusham presents the award annually on Human Rights Day,
which falls on Dec. 10. The award is in memory of Yap Thiam
Hien, a prominent human rights advocate who died in 1989.

The jury for this year's award were Abdurrahman Wahid, the
leader of Moslem socio-educational organization Nahdlatul Ulama,
Adnan Buyung Nasution, chairman of the Indonesian Legal Aid
Foundation, Amartiwi Saleh, a Bandung-based respected lawyer, Dr.
Deliar Noer, a political scholar at the University of Indonesia,
and Y.B. Mangunwijaya, a noted author.

The jury decided to give the award to Trimoelya for his
continuous struggle in the defense of human rights, which peaked
in the case of Marsinah.

"Since the beginning, he (Trimoelya) sensed that there must be
an "engineering" in the trial of Marsinah case. And he had been
determined to disclose it," Buyung said.

Ironically, Trimoelya followed in the footsteps of Marsinah,
who was posthumously awarded the Yap Thiam Hien Award last year
for her struggle in the cause of her colleague workers.

Nine people, all directors and staff of Judi Susanto, were
convicted for her murder. But their trials were fraught with
controversy from the time of their arrests to the time they were
convicted. Allegations that their rights were trampled during
arrest and interrogation prompted the National Commission on
Human Rights early this year to launch an investigation. Its
findings stated that there were indications of such violations.

"I am grateful for being given the award," Trimoelya said
later yesterday when contacted by phone in Surabaya. "I want to
be a good and professional lawyer," he said, explaining why he
had strived for the promotion of human rights.

Guts

He said he was concerned with the implementation of human
rights in the country. "Somebody must have the guts to confront
the authorities. Otherwise, the condition will get worse."

Trimoelya, 55, was given the award not only because of the
Marsinah case, but because of his long struggle for human rights,
according to the foundation.

Trimoelya, who handled a number of controversial cases, had
become the target of terror campaigns by unanimous callers, who
threatened to take his life. These campaigns were believed to be
connected with the various cases he handled.

In 1986 Trimoelya, a believer of the fact that human rights
must be respected regardless of religion, ethnicity, political
belief, defended a married couple of Chinese descent who were
accused of assaulting their housemaids.

Another controversial case he dealt with involved David
Hendra, a Christian priest charged with disgracing Moslem people
in 1992.

Long before that, in 1981, Trimoelya sued the government for
increasing the TV subscription fee, reminding the defendant not
to act arbitrarily and at the same time try to improve the
consumers' rights.

Trimoelya, now the chairman of the East Java chapter of the
Indonesian Bar Association (Ikadin) has been active in the
defense of human rights since he was a student.

He had been a member of the Surabaya city council,
representing the ruling Golkar party, before he decided to quit
the politics. He realized that in such a position he could not
do much to promote human rights. Therefore, he concentrated on
his profession as a lawyer. (imn/sim)

View JSON | Print