Is Malaysia getting rich too quick?
Is Malaysia getting rich too quick?
By Anil Noel Netto
KUALA LUMPUR: The year 2020 has been listed here as the time
when Malaysia would attain the status of an industrialized
nations but, going by the increased consumption among its rising
middle class, the country has already "arrived".
Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad's 'Vision 2020' program has
aspired to give the country the same standard of living as
Scandinavia in 25 years -- with Malaysians able to enjoy a
comparable income level to Europeans, the same health and
education statistics.
Long before the target date, however, evidence is mounting
that a culture of materialism and crass consumption is fast
becoming a way of life among Malaysia's burgeoning middle-class,
irrespective of ethnic background. It looks like newly-affluent
Malaysians can't wait to live like Europeans.
To be sure, these signs are not restricted to Malaysia. Other
East Asian tiger economies like Singapore, Thailand and Indonesia
are showing similar trends. But the Malaysian economy is one of
the fastest growing -- at a blistering eight percent annually --
and consumerism seems most pronounced here.
Signs of affluence are visible all over Kuala Lumpur: posh
bungalows with up to six cars parked on the driveway, swimming
pools and landscaped gardens with gushing waterfalls in the back
lawn. Inside, the villas have imported fittings and extensive
renovations that testify to the owners' newfound wealth. These
trappings announce to society that the owners have `arrived.'
Some corporate-types prefer to live in tastefully designed
country homes, away from the congestion and pollution in Kuala
Lumpur. Membership in exclusive country clubs signals that the
holder has reached the upper rungs of the corporate ladder.
Holidays? Hop on a plane to Europe, Australia or Disneyland.
Sociologists worry about this trend. "Malaysians are growing
through a stage of misguided materialism," says social analyst
Jubal Lourdes. "Our development model appears to be centered on
materialism and consumerism rather than on people."
Even the government, he says, is becoming profligate. In the
center of Kuala Lumpur is rising the world's tallest building.
The government is going ahead with the three billion dollar Bakun
Dam in Sarawak and a new capital is under construction south of
Kuala Lumpur, to be linked by an "information super-corridor".
All this could be a sign of visionary leadership and proof
that under Mahathir's guidance -- through good governance, far-
sighted planning and ability to think big -- a Third World
country has pulled itself by its bootstraps and is fast becoming
industrialized. But there is nagging doubt that somewhere amidst
all this affluence, a key ingredient is missing.
Sales of flashy European cars have also soared: typically it's
a Mercedes for the successful CEO and a BMW for the well-heeled
professional. Many among the middle class and the elite scramble
to apply for shares whenever there is a company about to be
listed.
Successful applicants pocket a tidy profit when they sell
their shares immediately after flotation. Other investors snap up
property in London or Australia.
The New Economic Policy (NEP), which started in 1970 with the
aim of distributing 30 percent of national wealth to the
marginalised indigenous community, hoisted many Malays onto the
mainstream of the economy. Through affirmative action policies,
large numbers of Malays joined the ranks of the middle class.
Many non-Malays -- who initially felt left out by the NEP-
benefited as the foreign stake in the Malaysian economy dwindled.
Today, as the economy is liberalized, seven out of Malaysia's top
ten entrepreneurs are Chinese Malaysians.
The nouveau riche has fueled the ambitions of the middle-
class. There's a growing perception in Malaysia that everyone has
a chance of getting rich quick as the country prospers, and
nobody wants to be left out in the pursuit of wealth. But what is
worrisome to sociologists is that increasingly, the perception is
wealth can be acquired without hard work -- perhaps by
speculating in shares, by investing astutely in property, by
using the right connections to clinch surefire business deals.
Even so, not everyone is rich. "The pressure on the lower-
middle class to keep up in the race for more wealth is growing
heavier," observes Lourdes. "This leads to all kinds of vice --
from indulging in corrupt practices to selling one's soul to make
more money."
The nation seems to be experiencing a lot of social ills in
the name of progress. Even as sales of designer clothes soar, the
gap between the rich and the poor threatens to widen. The 1996
United Nations Human Development Report states that the share of
income of the lowest 40 percent of Malaysian households was only
13 percent in 1981-1993. This compares with 21 percent in
Indonesia, 16 percent in Thailand and 17 percent in the
Philippines.
Although inflation appears under control at 3-4 percent
annually, spiraling food and house prices have hit the poor
hardest. There are still urban squatter settlements and hundreds
of thousands of low-cost houses are desperately needed.
Despite the signs of newfound wealth everywhere, something
seems to be missing in Malaysian public life. Social analysts
struggle to pinpoint what it is. A deeply-rooted sense of culture
perhaps. Or is it a tradition of creative and critical thinking
that is lacking?
Perhaps it is the sheer emptiness that unbridled materialism
brings about -- the inability of wealth in itself to fulfill
society's deepest aspirations. Many are turning to religion to
search for some meaning behind the rat-race.
The major religions practiced in Malaysia -- Islam, Buddhism,
Hinduism and Christianity -- have experienced varying shades of
revivalism; however, even religious rituals seem to be tainted by
materialism. The emphasis seems to be on external rituals and
symbols -- rather than a deep spirituality that brings out the
values in each faith: love, a sense of justice, and compassion
for the less fortunate.
"The materialist value system has become ingrained in our
culture, which used to cherish simplicity and hard work," says
Lourdes. "The sad thing is that the nation is losing the courage
and the dynamism to be different."
-- IPS