Febrie Adriansyah asks judge to grant pre-trial motion over forced seizure

The legal team of former Junior Attorney General for Special Crimes (Jampidsus) Febrie Adriansyah has requested that the judge of the South Jakarta District Court grant a pre-trial motion concerning the case of forced seizure efforts. ‘The petitioner requests the Honourable Chief of the South Jakarta District Court, through the Pre-trial Judge examining and adjudicating this case, to issue a ruling: first, to accept and grant the Pre-trial Motion submitted by the Petitioner in its entirety,’ said Febrie Adriansyah’s legal counsel, Febri Diansyah, during the reading of the pre-trial petition at the South Jakarta District Court on Tuesday.

The second petition seeks to declare Investigation Order Number: SP.Sidik/2932/VII/RES.3.3/2026/Polda Metro Jaya dated 6 July 2026, issued by Respondent I, as invalid, null and void, and legally defective as the basis for carrying out forced measures against the Petitioner.

Third, the motion seeks to declare Search Warrant Number: SP. Dah/3006/VII/RES.3.3./2026/Polda Metro Jaya, carried out by Respondent I and accompanied by Respondent II at the Petitioner’s family residence in Sentul City, Parahyangan Golf 2 Cluster (also known as Bogor Golf Hijau Housing), Babakan Madang District, Bogor Regency, West Java Province, on Wednesday night, 8 July 2026 until early Thursday morning, 9 July 2026 at approximately 01.00 WIB, as invalid and without binding legal force.

‘Fifth, to declare Suspect Determination Letter Number: S.Tap/02/VII/RES.3.3/2026/Polda Metro Jaya dated 10 July 2026, issued by Respondent I against the Petitioner, as invalid and without binding legal force,’ said Febri.

Sixth, the motion seeks to declare the travel ban imposed by Respondent I on the Petitioner, preventing travel outside the territory of the Republic of Indonesia for 20 days based on Letter Number: B/12730/VII/RES.3.3/2026/Ditreskrimsus Polda Metro Jaya dated 11 July 2026, as invalid and without binding legal force.

The petition further seeks to declare invalid and without binding legal force all Investigation Orders issued by the Co-Respondent, namely Number: PRIN-43/F/Fd.2/07/2026 dated 11 July 2026, PRIN-44/F/Fd.2/07/2026 dated 11 July 2026, and PRIN-45/F/Fd.2/07/2026 dated 11 July 2026, as they constitute derivative actions from Respondent I’s Investigation Order and the invalid suspect determination against the Petitioner in this case.

Eighth, the motion seeks to declare Summons Letter Number: SPT-3412/F.2/Fd.2/07/2026 dated 15 July 2026, issued by the Co-Respondent against the Petitioner, which relies on the invalid suspect determination and forced measures in this case, as invalid and without binding legal force.

Tenth, the petition requests a declaration that all subsequent legal actions solely based on the invalid suspect determination and forced measures by Respondent I, whether already carried out or to be carried out by the Co-Respondent, have no binding legal force.

Eleventh, the motion requests the Co-Respondent be ordered to halt all investigation actions and subsequent legal actions against the Petitioner that rely on the invalid suspect determination and forced measures, with all legal consequences thereof.

Twelfth, the petition requests the Co-Respondent be ordered to return all property belonging to the Petitioner and his family that was taken and/or seized in intact condition, immediately after the ruling is pronounced.

‘Fourteenth, to charge the court costs arising from this petition to the state; or if the Honourable Pre-trial Judge holds a different opinion, to issue a ruling that is as fair as possible (ex aequo et bono),’ said Febri.

Febrie Adriansyah’s first pre-trial motion is registered under case number 134/Pid.Pra/2026/PN.JKT.SEL. The sole judge in the hearing is Richard Edwin Basoeki. In the case, the respondents are the Special Criminal Investigation Directorate (Ditreskrimsus) of Polda Metro Jaya, the Corruption Eradication Corps (Kortastipidkor) of the Indonesian National Police, and the Investigation Directorate of the Junior Attorney General for Special Crimes. The first motion relates to forced measures carried out by the Attorney General’s Office in determining suspect status in an alleged money laundering case and forced detention efforts.