Indonesian Political, Business & Finance News

Facebook Defends Hate Content Calling for War Against Islam, Refuses to Remove

| Source: CNBC Translated from Indonesian | Technology
Facebook Defends Hate Content Calling for War Against Islam, Refuses to Remove
Image: CNBC

Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has reportedly refused to remove posts containing open calls for violence and hatred against Muslims, even though the content was reported for violating platform rules. The content, largely consisting of AI-generated images, has been allowed to spread widely, according to Futurism on Tuesday (18/8/2026).

The wave of hatred began with a post by far-right American influencer Jake Lang, who shared an AI-generated poster calling for a ‘Crusade March to Dearborn’ on 18 August 2026. Dearborn, Michigan, is home to the largest Arab-American community in the United States. The poster depicted armed soldiers with swords charging into a crowd of Muslims, with a message to ‘stop the Islamification of America’.

The content was reported to Facebook because it clearly called for violence. However, within just one minute, an automated response from the platform stated that the post would not be removed. No further explanation was given as to why the open call for violence was allowed to remain.

In addition, various other posts with extreme hateful tones remain accessible to this day. Some refer to Muslims as ‘cockroaches’, state that ‘it is time to hunt’, and call for the expulsion and extermination of all Muslims from the US. Comments containing death threats are also reported to remain visible after being reported.

When asked for comment, Meta merely referred to its policy of protecting refugees and immigrants from the most severe attacks, while stating that it still allows ‘criticism of immigration policy’. The company did not provide a detailed explanation as to why open calls for violence and dehumanising language do not fall into the category that must be removed.

The report highlights that AI-generated hate images spread far more quickly and widely because they are designed to provoke anger, which Facebook’s algorithm favours. The more users interact, the wider the reach, meaning the hatred is effectively propagated by Meta’s own system.

This pattern is reminiscent of Facebook’s role in spreading hate speech that fuelled violence against the Rohingya minority in Myanmar in 2017, which the UN later assessed as having played a decisive role in the tragedy. AI now compounds the problem because machine-generated images can be mass-produced and spread to millions of people within minutes.

Various parties argue that Meta appears to allow hatred to spread as long as it generates user engagement and advertising revenue. Meta’s own terms and conditions prohibit calls for violence and language that degrades particular groups based on religion.

To date, Meta has not provided a detailed explanation as to why posts that clearly violate policy are allowed to remain online. This situation raises serious questions about the content moderation systems across all Meta-owned platforms, namely Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Threads.

View JSON | Print