Dual role of the Armed Forces

Dual role of the Armed Forces

From Jayakarta

People are now discussing the function of the Armed Forces' dual role, and it is interesting to know that there are different opinions on this matter. Basically, every country recognizes this dual role system, both in military and civilian circles.

The military is involved in civilian affairs whenever the country is in a state of war. But in this country the dual role of the Armed Forces is rather overdone. We have to make it work proportionally. Political science teaches us that the Armed Forces are a second force in upholding the integrity of the administration, while philosophers are ranked first in the civilian government.

In countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and others, elderly scholars devote their lives to their country. On the contrary, philosophers as well as scholars are not fully utilized here, resulting in the presence of military personnel in the civilian sector.

In western countries the military has a substantial role to play, too. In the U.S., for example, former presidents Kennedy, Carter, Bush and many others, came from a military background. Their implementation of a dual role is based on "fair play." Children were put in military academies at the expense of their respected families, free from a government draft. After graduating, they were placed in dangerous war zones. If they proved themselves to be meritorious, their families would call them back to handle their business. When they grew up they could run in elections for prominent government positions, and if they had enough influence, they could go for the presidency.

The dual role is known and practiced in every country in the world. This is because the military is a well-organized, professional group. No other group has so strong an association as the military. It is understandable that many military personnel become leaders of this nation, but what matters most is that they function in their role in a fair way.

MULYA

Jakarta