Contents of Central Jakarta District Court Ruling That Forms Basis for Hotel Sultan Execution
The Central Jakarta District Court has officially commenced the execution of the asset vacate order in the Hotel Sultan complex, Senayan, Jakarta. The process began with the reading of the Central Jakarta District Court Chief’s ruling, which serves as the legal basis for the execution against the land of former Right to Build (HGB) Number 26/Gelora and Number 27/Gelora.
“The District Court summons PT Indobuildco as the convention plaintiff, reconvention defendant, now execution respondent. Third summons. The District Court summons PT Indobuildco, convention plaintiff, reconvention defendant, execution respondent or its proxy,” said the Central Jakarta District Court Registrar during the reading of the ruling on Thursday (18/6/2026).
After the summons was conducted, the Registrar read out the Central Jakarta District Court Chief’s Ruling Number 1/Pdt.Eks/2026/PN Jakarta Pusat in conjunction with Number 208/Pdt.G/2025/PN Jakarta Pusat, which contains the execution request from the Minister of State Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia and the Gelora Bung Karno Complex Management Centre (PPKGBK).
The document explains that the two institutions submitted a request for the court to carry out the vacating and return of the land along with the buildings situated on former HGB 26/Gelora and former HGB 27/Gelora.
“The execution petitioners have requested the Chief of the Central Jakarta District Court to carry out the execution of vacating and returning to the reconvention plaintiffs the land parcels of former HGB 26/Gelora and former HGB 27/Gelora along with the buildings and everything attached to them,” the Registrar stated.
Before issuing the ruling, the court first conducted a constatering, or matching of the object to be executed. The results of this examination then became one of the bases for the panel of judges’ consideration in deciding on the execution request.
The court subsequently concluded that the request submitted by the petitioners had fulfilled the applicable legal provisions and could therefore be carried out.
“Considering that based on the matters mentioned above, the Central Jakarta District Court is of the opinion that the execution petitioners’ request regarding the vacate execution has met the requirements, is not contrary to law, and can be granted,” the Registrar said.
Through the ruling signed by Central Jakarta District Court Chief Dr. Henny Helthima on 30 April 2026, the court ordered the registrar and bailiffs to carry out the vacating process. In its implementation, police officers or other instruments of state power may be involved if required.
“Ordering the Registrar of the Central Jakarta District Court, or if they are unable, to appoint a competent bailiff accompanied by two witnesses and, if necessary, with the assistance of the Indonesian National Police or other instruments of state power to carry out the vacate execution,” he stated.
After reading out the ruling, the Registrar confirmed that the next stage is the execution of all buildings included in the case object.
“Furthermore, we, the Registrar and the junior criminal registrars along with the bailiffs and substitute bailiffs, will carry out the execution on 15 building objects on former HGB 26 and 27,” the Registrar concluded.