BMKG Responds to Proposal to Avoid Using 'Computer Language' in Public Information
Boyman Harun, a member of Commission V of the House of Representatives (DPR), has requested that BMKG refrain from using difficult language when delivering disaster-related information to the public. The Secretary of BMKG, Guswanto, stated that efforts to use simpler language are already underway.
“In fact, we are already doing that. BMKG has four targets in information dissemination: accuracy, speed, ease of understanding, and wide reach. Ease of understanding means that BMKG has actually been disseminating information using language that laypeople can understand,” said Guswanto following a hearing with Commission V of the DPR at the parliamentary complex in Senayan, Jakarta, on Tuesday (8/9/2026).
He acknowledged that simplifying language requires time depending on the specific region. Guswanto added that BMKG has also attempted to translate information into local languages.
“However, it does take time because the translation from technical language to public language depends on the region. We are even attempting to translate it into local languages,” he explained.
Guswasting stated that the agency agrees with the proposal to provide information to the public in easily understandable language, but admitted that this must be implemented in stages.
“Regarding the use of more ‘grounded’ language, we agree. However, it cannot happen instantly like turning over a palm. It must be done gradually,” he said.
The legislator’s proposal regarding BMKG avoiding ‘computer language’ came during a meeting between Commission V, Basarnas, and BMKG. Boyman Harun, a politician from the PAN party, initially noted that BMKG’s functions and duties have not yet reached their maximum potential.
“What I want to convey to BMKG is that I see the functions and duties of BMKG are not yet maximal—not optimal, but maximal,” said Boyman.
BMKG was urged to synergise with other agencies regarding disaster management. Boyman cited forest and land fires (karhutla) as an example, where BMKG should provide information that can be used for mitigation.
“Do not just convey, for example, that this month will be the dry season or this month will be the rainy season; my point is that there is no anticipation,” he noted.
Boyman specifically addressed BMKG’s use of difficult language, requesting that the agency use simpler terms so the public can understand. “I also request that in providing information to the public, there is no need to use ‘BMKG language’ or language printed directly from a computer. Not everyone understands; we must use our own language, use language that is easy to understand, so that the public knows what is going to happen,” he said.