Attorney General's Office: Case Involving Village Profile Video in Karo That Implicates Toni Aji Has Become Final
The Attorney General’s Office (Kejagung) has responded to a mass action demanding the release of convicted individual in the corruption case of producing village profiles in Karo, Toni Aji Anggoro. Kejagung states that the decision against Toni has become final and binding, or inkrah.
Quoted from detikSumut on Thursday (23/4/2026), members of Putera Jawa Kelahiran Sumatera (Pujakesuma) held a protest at the Medan District Court (PN Medan) demanding the release of Toni Aji Anggoro in the corruption case of producing village profiles in Karo. The action took place on the previous Monday (20/4).
Toni Aji himself is one of the defendants in the corruption case of producing village profiles in Karo. He was charged alongside the videographer or owner of CV Promiseland, Amsal Christy Sitepu or Amsal Sitepu, Jesaya Perangin-angin as Director of CV Arih Ersada Perdana (AEP), and Amry KS Pelawi as Owner of CV Gundaling Production.
Meanwhile, another individual, Jesaya Ginting as Director of CV Simalem Agro Technofarm (SAT), is a fugitive (DPO).
Jesaya was sentenced to 20 months in prison and ordered to pay restitution of Rp 228 million. Toni Aji was sentenced to 1 year in prison and a fine of Rp 50 million, subsidiary 2 months in prison.
Unlike those two defendants, Amsal Sitepu was acquitted. The matter of Amsal Sitepu had been widely discussed some time ago because his video went viral, with demands for a 2-year prison sentence in this case, leading to the DPR holding a public hearing (RDPU).
Head of Public Information and Communication at Kejagung, Anang Supriatna, responded to the mass demonstration regarding Toni Aji. Anang said the case implicating Toni Aji has already become final and binding, or inkrah.
“It is already inkrah,” said Anang Supriatna at the Kejagung building in South Jakarta.
Anang stated that the case implicating Toni Aji is substantively different from that of Amsal Sitepu. Although both cases were handled by the Karo District Prosecutor’s Office.
“This case has already proceeded and is inkrah. But it’s a different case (from Amsal Sitepu). It was indeed handled by the Karo Prosecutor’s Office. No issue, it’s inkrah. In this case, some are inkrah, some are DPO,” explained Anang.
“Each case is not the same. There are characteristics of each. The type may be the same, but the characteristics differ for sure,” he continued.
He mentioned that Toni Aji has already been executed. This, he said, strengthens the presence of a criminal corruption act leading the judge to impose the sentence.
“What is clear is that I received information that the case is already inkrah, already proven, that’s it. It has been executed,” stated Anang.
Spokesperson for PN Medan, Soniady Drajat Sadarisman, also commented. Soniady revealed that Toni’s case has long been inkrah.
“The court states that the decision against Toni Aji Anggoro has become inkrah and is not under the authority of PN Medan,” said Soniady to detikSumut.
According to Soniady, Toni Aji’s case was decided on 28 January 2026. That verdict also became final and binding on 5 February 2026.
“The case was decided on 28 January 2026 and became final and binding (BHT) on 5 February 2026,” he concluded.