AGO Reveals It Has Been Studying Febrie Case for Nearly Two Weeks After Kortas Tipidkor Handover

The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) has confirmed that the handling of the case involving former Junior Attorney General for Special Crimes (Jampidsus) Febrie Adriansyah is ongoing. Investigators are currently focusing on thoroughly studying three cases handed over by the Police’s Corruption Eradication Corps (Kortas Tipidkor) before determining the next legal steps.

Junior Attorney General for Supervision (Jamwas) Rudi Margono stated that the process of examining the cases has been underway for nearly two weeks since the files and evidence were received from police investigators. He said this time was used to assess all the evidence and exhibits collected in the three cases related to alleged corruption in coal mining, PT ASABRI, and Krakatau Steel.

‘We have been studying it for almost two weeks up to today,’ Rudi Margono said during a press conference at the Attorney General’s Office building in South Jakarta on Friday, 24 July 2026.

Rudi explained that the AGO’s Team 9 did not immediately proceed with the examination after receiving the case handover from the Kortas Tipidkor and Polda investigators. Instead, the team first reviewed all the submitted evidence. The assessment covered documents and exhibits from the previous investigation. From this process, the AGO found grounds to expand the investigation into alleged money laundering (TPPU).

He stated that the results of this review led to the issuance of a new investigation warrant (sprindik) regarding the alleged money laundering on 20 July 2026. ‘We continue to work technically, assessing all existing evidence, assessing the exhibits. Finally, on 20 July 2026, we issued investigation warrant number three regarding the alleged criminal act of money laundering,’ he said. The warrant was issued after the AGO received evidence from searches previously conducted by police investigators.

Rudi explained that the investigation warrant for the alleged money laundering was issued so that all evidence found could be analysed comprehensively within a single series of investigations. According to him, investigators need broader scope to develop the case if new evidence related to the alleged money laundering is later discovered.