Will Indonesian batik survive challenges?

Will Indonesian batik survive challenges?

By Dini S. Djalal

JAKARTA (JP): What is the future of batik? After centuries of
persevering through cultural, economic and political upheavals,
Indonesia's batik crafts now face the challenges of the new
millennium. Will batik adorn the nation in the year 2020?

Only if it survives the competition from contemporary casual
wear. The culture of shopping malls is dictating conformity,
whether in the shape of Levi's and a GAP t-shirts, or trendier
versions of the same uniform.

"Ethnic" shops occasionally appear among imported clothes.
Plaza Indonesia has a Batik Keris shop, Mal Pondok Indah has a
Ghea Sukarya (read: "ethnic" designer) boutique, and Pasaraya
devotes one whole floor to "ethnic" clothes. Outside, in the
traditional market places, the same scarcity prevails. If you're
shopping for batik, don't blink or you might miss it.

The problem lies in batik design, designers explain. At a
seminar on Wednesday on the development of craft design and
industry at the National Museum, designer Ardiyanto Pranata
stressed the need to revitalize the batik industry.

"Our capacity for creative batik design needs to be improved,"
said Pranata.

Pranata believes that if batik looked more modern, it would
sell more on the international market.

Yet the international stage is much kinder to batik artists
than the domestic market. Iwan Tirta's batiks have been worn by
the world's kings and queens, and countless celebrities. On her
first visit to Indonesia last June, CNN fashion reporter Elsa
Klench remarked that Indonesia's textiles were among the most
exquisite in the world. In co-operation with Takashimaya
department store, Pranata exports his batiks to Japan.

Batik's success is not in question, but the domestic industry
is. It was not until 1974, when governor of Jakarta Ali Sadikin
declared batik to be official formal wear, that batik regained
its fast-fading prestige. Since then, the affluence of
Indonesia's elite has inflated batik prices. Yet a promotional
and administrative body specifically for batik development has
yet to be established.

Many other organizations have been established, such as the
Indonesian Fashion Designers Council, the Indonesian Fashion
Designers Association, the National Design Center and the
Foundation for Indonesian Crafts and Design Development. How
these organizations facilitate exports, production or marketing
is unclear. While the ceremonial chores of these paper-shuffling
umbrella organizations are assisted by the ministry of industry
or the ministry of cooperatives and small businesses, the task of
exporting is often the responsibility of individual designers.

That these organizations exist at least provides hope to the
textile and fashion industry. But batik falls under this wide
domain, when ideally it deserves its own network.

It is a marvel that batik retains its resilience despite all
the obstacles. One of the many myths which burden batik's
development is its supposed sacredness, deeming batik inflexible
in the face of changing fashion trends.

What people fail to realize, Pranata says, is batik's
dynamism. The traditional batiks of Central Java's royal palaces
may claim the highest prestige and ritual value, but less
ceremonial batiks also flourished in the past. The jelamprang and
ceplokan batiks of Gresik and Kudus were heavily influenced by
Islamic symbols and calligraphy. The batik of Cirebon and
Pekalongan bear the esthetics of the Chinese and Indische
(Eurasian) communities, favoring bright, colorful and flowery
motifs.

During the Japanese occupation, batik artists turned to very
detailed Japanese patterns called the hokukai. These tulus (fine)
works only added to the myth that the best batiks are the most
complicated.

"Good batik is not only fine batik. The reason why batik was
so detailed then was because cloth was so scarce during wartime,"
explained Pranata.

Today, the problem is not fabric scarcity but abundance.
Pranata points out that batik's reputation is threatened by the
profusion of batik manufacturers. These manufacturers employ
artists whose wages are determined by commission. The results,
Pranata explains, are "works of quantity not quality."

Many of these manufacturers and artists inherited their work
from their parents. Thus their motifs are often a generation old,
and have limited appeal. In order to revive batik design "it is
time for us to set up a batik academy", says Pranata.

Through this academy, batik producers may explore batik's
history and diversity, and derive inspiration from it. Pranata
illustrates the stagnation in batik design by choosing any batik
producer and comparing their current designs with that of ten
years ago.

"What are the motifs and colors of their designs, and how
often have these designs been reproduced? Are they using new
textiles? Are the designs fashionable?" asked Pranata, before
concluding that many producers fail to remain fashionable.

Designer Iwan Tirta offers another explanation. For twenty
years, Tirta has unsuccessfully lobbied for the creation of a
batik trademark, much like the international wool or sterling
silver trademark.

"With a batik trademark, we can ensure the quality of the
batik by making all batik producers take the trademark test,"
Tirta explained.

"You should not be able to sell any print and call it batik.
Batik is an art," Tirta said.

A batik trademark would also automatically increase batik's
(and Indonesia's) prestige, as it would acknowledge credit where
it is due. American, French, and Italian designers, including
Giorgio Armani, have used batik fabrics in their designs without
referring to the clothes as batik. A batik trademark would at
last legitimize batik, not only as folk art but as an
international art industry. If the batik industry wants to
successfully compete with modern fashion and the modern textile
industry, then it has to be treated in the same manner and follow
the same rules.

Ardiyanto Pranata still offers hope.

"The problem lies in education," said Pranata. "With the
increase in education, more people will appreciate domestic
products. Our national pride will not decline, but increase with
time," said Pranata.