Threats against the press: Media is its own enemy

Threats against the press: Media is its own enemy

Ong Hock Chuan, Maverick, Jakarta

Restrictions and pressures from the TNI over reporting in
Aceh, libel suits from businessmen like Tomy Winata against Tempo
weekly, Texmaco boss Marimutu Sinivasan against Tempo and Kompas
daily, as well as politicians Akbar Tandjung and President
Megawati Soekarnoputri against Rakyat Merdeka, have prompted some
senior journalists to proclaim that the Fourth Estate is under
threat.

The Indonesian Corruption Watch (ICM) went one step further:
There is foul play in the recent increase in the number of
lawsuits against the media, it claims. "The powers which were
momentarily discomfited by the reform movement are currently
consolidating themselves," proclaimed coordinator Teten Masduki.

So there you are -- the evil and sinister forces are back and
they are out to destroy press freedom through the courts. The
implication here is that if the media loses any of these cases,
it will be because of these sinister forces or the corrupt court
system; but it can never be the fault of the press itself.

There is something flawed with the insinuations here. It
presupposes a black-and-white world in which the bad guys
(business fat cats and politicians) can do no good and the good
guys (the free press) can do no wrong.

The press in Indonesia have certainly been the good guys even
before Reformasi (reform). Tempo's brave reporting, which led to
its closure by the government in June 1994, is now legend. Other
media pushed the envelope in ways that their, say, Malaysian or
Singaporean counterparts would never dare.

The press was one of the major forces that brought about
Reformasi and to this day, Indonesia has one of the most vibrant
and free press in Southeast Asia. I remember a client from
Singapore being in awe of Indonesian journalists because,
contrary to her expectations, they were interested and asked more
intelligent questions than their ASEAN neighbors.

Ironically, however, Indonesia's press freedom may have also
created the very conditions that could undermine its freedom.

The freedom that came after Reformasi allowed literally anyone
to become a publisher or media owner. An explosion of the media
industry was the result. Publications mushroomed overnight. Some
failed, but still more filled their places. There are now so many
publications in Indonesia that no one can keep track.

A testament to this explosion is the fact that Jakarta had
only three TV stations in 1997 -- it now has 11.

The rapid expansion of the industry resulted in a demand for
talent that was not there. There are a few seasoned journalists
who know their stuff, but they are vastly outnumbered by
reporters who cannot get their facts and names right.

On Monday, a journalist wrote about our company's first
anniversary in a society column where, in a few short paragraphs
and captions, he managed to change our evening function into a
luncheon, our public relations consultancy into an event
organizer, misspelled three names and even got the food we had
served, wrong.

The media explosion also gave rise to intense competition.
Since most of the publications, even the top ones, rely more on
street -- rather than subscription -- sales for their
circulation, the temptation to sensationalize and be the first
with the hot news became extreme.

In such a market, the strong became stronger. Certain
publications rode on their reputations to greater dominance of
the market. Some of them now feel so unassailable that hubris has
begun to creep in, while they feel that their journalistic
standards are beyond reproach.

All these factors combined are the real threats to press
freedom in Indonesia, not the political and business fat cats. In
a democracy, these businesses actually have a right to sue the
media if they feel that they are aggrieved and the media has
acted in bad faith. The question here is whether the businessmen
and politicians are justified in thinking so.

The sad conclusion is that the businesses and politicians,
more often than not, have a valid legal case against the media
but do not go to court because first, Indonesia is not a
litigious society and second, it is an uphill task to pick a
fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel.

There have been many cases where a business was not given the
right to respond or a chance to tell its side of the story. A
colleague was once lectured by an editor on the immorality of my
working for a conglomerate, when he called on behalf of a client
to clarify certain points raised in a newspaper article. In the
editor's view, it was despicable to work for a conglomerate, and
whatever the colleague had to say was not worth hearing.

Never mind the facts.

A readiness to pass judgment, an unwillingness to impose
strict standards of checking facts, ignoring the principle of
covering both sides of the story, not corroborating information
from sources with a second or third source, not putting
journalists who malign and make wild and damaging claims on
record, and passing off innuendo and allegations as facts have
been some of the sins of the media of late.

Taken collectively, they are the soft underbelly of the media
when it comes to press freedom. If these problems are not solved
soon, it would leave the media totally vulnerable to lawsuits
that could bankrupt many media companies that we'd sooner see
imperfect but open, rather than closed. It is denial that is the
media's biggest enemy to solving these problems. The sooner the
media addresses these problems, the sooner Indonesia's press
freedom will be ensured.

While it is true that businessmen and politicians may conspire
with the courts to act against the media, it is also true that
the media -- which has a history of drawing together as a single
force, as evidenced during the Tomy Winata-Tempo case -- can
exert tremendous pressure. Judges, after all, also do not want to
pick fights with people who buy ink by the barrel.

No, it is not the courts nor the businessman nor the
politicians that the media needs to fear in regards its freedom.

It is the media itself that is its greatest enemy.

Maverick is a public relations consultancy that specializes in
crisis and issues management as well as brand strategy. It also
trains corporate executives in media handling skills.