Sat, 29 Oct 2005

The arrest of Harini Wijoso by the Corruption Eradication Court (KPK), the lawyer of Soeharto's half-brother Probosutedjo, following an alleged attempt to bribe Supreme Court chief justice Bagir Manan, again strengthens public negative perceptions about the profession of advocates.

Advocates are supposed to provide a range of legal services to those who need them. The Law No 18.2003 on advocates expressly stipulates that legal services refer to the services rendered by advocates in the form of legal consultation and legal aid.

The roles of advocates is obviously much more in demand as people becoming increasingly law-abiding and when the image of law enforcement is worsening.

It is important to look into legal experts' opinions about how advocates should be obligated to their clients. These experts say that advocates must not blindly defend their clients just because they are getting paid.

Indonesian lawyers are often teased as people who Maju tak gentar bela yang bayar (Move forward fearlessly -- to defend those who pay).

A well-known legal expert, Sudikno Mertokusumo, once pointed out, "The obligation of the lawyer to the client is to give legal aid, which also means to protect the client from inconsiderate treatment which is contrary to the law. He/she must highly respect the law, which means that he/she must follow legal channels in rendering legal aid to the client and avoid using illegal means."

He goes on to mention an example: If the lawyer's client admits to actually perpetrating a murder, then the lawyer should not turn the facts upside down by having the client deny evidence or otherwise perjure themselves. If their client is proven to have committed a murder, then the lawyer may defend the interests of the client by pleading for lighter sentence by providing extenuating evidence that may lighten the punishment.

The image and dignity of advocates as one of the legal professions is still poor. This is in no small way due to the behavior and the practices of lawyers themselves.

From media reports we find there are lawyers who are involved in physical fights in the courtroom. We may also find certain lawyers kidnapping children, physically grabbing opponent's clients in the courts, acting like private detectives, abandoning their client's case at the drop of a hat, acting or behaving improperly against opponents or partners of the same profession, acting as "case-brokers" by attempting to bribe judges, and speaking in a way which shows disrespect to the law or to the courts.

All such conduct should never happen in the daily practice of this profession. Advocates should have enough capacity for self- reflection to allow them to comply with their office's oaths and code of ethics. This kind of negative behavior is indeed a serious and worrying condition -- it makes the courts become seen as a joke.

The worst crimes that weaken the legitimacy of the law in the eyes of the public are the widespread reports of bribery -- corrupt advocates in collusion with the police, prosecutors and judges who buy and sell verdicts. Lawyers who want to follow fast tracks and who engage in bribery to get their clients off, destroy the image -- and the rule --- of the law.

The standard procedures for legal defense in court based on professional capabilities and skills now no longer have anything to with success, money does.

The corrupting influence of money means that legal reasoning and argument is gradually losing its meaning, as debates in court hearings are becoming more like made-up performances, a travesty of justice. In other words, well-grounded premises seem to be one thing and winning the case is another.

The time has come for advocates to return to ethical behavior. It is my hope that this once noble profession will not in future be polluted with such illegal, improper and irresponsible behavior.

In every way, the values of truth and justice should be highly respected and be given priority by advocates when performing their professional duties, be it in-court representation or out- of-court assistance.

With this spirit for change, a more positive, dignified and noble face of advocates may emerge.

The writer is a law practitioner in Jakarta.