Successive riots: Why?

The recent Tasikmalaya riots are regrettable, because the outburst seems rife with racist and sectarian motives.

This is not the first time such an incident has occurred, and our national leaders are sad and confused. How could these tragedies happen in a Pancasila society which upholds the motto: "Unity in Diversity"? It has become obvious the riots were directed against Chinese and non-Moslems.

Some sociologists believe social injustice and social disparity cause riots. The people feel the Chinese are in a favorable economic position, and that many Indonesian officials -- intentionally or unintentionally -- have helped create a situation where around four percent of Indonesian Chinese control almost 70 percent of the national economy.

Only a small spark was needed to start these riots. This issue is popularly called a pribumi (indigenous peoples) and non- pribumi (non-indigenous peoples) affair. On the surface it looks like an economic issue, but there is more than that; perhaps it is an issue of national integration.

In his state address way back on Aug. 16, 1967, the President said: "To the whole nation I appeal not to be trapped into activities which might lead to racialism. We must draw a clear line between Chinese with foreign nationality and Indonesian citizens of Chinese descent, who have the same position, rights and obligations as their fellow Indonesians. We must avoid discriminatory treatment against them. On the other hand, the Indonesian citizens of Chinese descent should not postpone much longer steps to integrate and assimilate."

The Tasikmalaya riots were clearly directed against non- Moslems, burning and damaging churches, giving a poor image of Indonesia to foreign countries. Some time ago we read Indonesia was an excellent example of religious tolerance; we should keep it this way, because religion paired with uncontrolled fanaticism can bring disaster.

Religion is something we must feel with our heart and with full conviction. The President said in his address before a combined conference of religions on Nov. 30, 1967 that "the Government has the obligation to guarantee the right of every citizen to embrace religion of their choice and to perform their religious rites."

Surat No. 19 of the Koran says: "To you be your way, to me mine." Surat No. 2 verse 256 says: "Let there be no compulsion in religion. Truth stands out clear from error."

We have learned many bitter lessons from history. We must do our best to avoid recurrence of the same mistakes and troubles. Let us think and act constructively. If you have a difference of opinion, discuss it so the problem can be solved in the best possible way. Refrain from the use of force, as it will invite the government to take strong actions to maintain law and order.

I would like to conclude this letter by quoting House Speaker Wahono: "Perhaps these (violent incidents) were a manifestation of people's frustration. People could not control their emotion on seeing that their leaders's conduct fell short of their expectations."

SOEGIH ARTO

Jakarta