Social unrest
The controversy over the recent violence in Situbondo, Tasikmalaya and West Kalimantan have triggered different comments from government officials and political observers.
Some believe the widening economic and political disparities may be one of the main factors to have ignited the violence. It is also important to note that people have felt and experienced injustice and unfair treatment from the government. Many of the government's policies are inconsistent.
Development projects, big and small, are granted to certain companies, most of which are owned by the same firm or businessmen. Inconsistencies can be seen in many areas and are evident in government policies like the clove regulation (monopoly), the Supreme Court issue involving Adi Handoyo, the national car Timor, the PDI leadership and the chaotic financial report of the Transportation and Mines and Energy Ministries. All these irregularities and unfavorable conditions seem to have caused a feeling of frustration and dissatisfaction among the people.
People who suffer from hunger and live in poverty, and those who are unemployed can no longer control their temper and emotions easily when they see their leaders' actions do not conform to their expectations. It is regrettable, however, that people have used social and religious sentiments to vent their frustrations disrespecting law and order. Then we wonder what is really happening to the Indonesian people who usually take pride in being tolerant and friendly. What about the implementation of Pancasila philosophy?
The well-documented July 27 riots in Jakarta last year was triggered by the forceful takeover of the PDI headquarters by government-backed rival groups. In an opening speech of the House session earlier this year, Speaker Wahono said the authorities should prioritize preventive measures in handling social problems, so as not to unduly anger people. The repressive approach should be used only as a last resort.
He added that authorities and the public should use their common sense, instead of taking the law in their own hands. Also government officials should give practical examples rather than making statements on how to preserve national unity.
We cannot blame the media or the public for blowing the issue of wealth disparity out of proportion. Disparities in wealth exist all over the world. It is true that social disparities are not entirely to blame for the recent disturbances.
But it is time the government was sensitive to criticisms and suggestions and deeply examined the social ills. We should be wise, gentle and responsible in judging the situations that develop in society and should strive to create peace and order.
ALOYSIUS HARYONO
Jakarta