Social unrest
Social unrest
The controversy over the recent violence in Situbondo,
Tasikmalaya and West Kalimantan have triggered different comments
from government officials and political observers.
Some believe the widening economic and political disparities
may be one of the main factors to have ignited the violence. It
is also important to note that people have felt and experienced
injustice and unfair treatment from the government. Many of the
government's policies are inconsistent.
Development projects, big and small, are granted to certain
companies, most of which are owned by the same firm or
businessmen. Inconsistencies can be seen in many areas and are
evident in government policies like the clove regulation
(monopoly), the Supreme Court issue involving Adi Handoyo, the
national car Timor, the PDI leadership and the chaotic financial
report of the Transportation and Mines and Energy Ministries. All
these irregularities and unfavorable conditions seem to have
caused a feeling of frustration and dissatisfaction among the
people.
People who suffer from hunger and live in poverty, and those
who are unemployed can no longer control their temper and
emotions easily when they see their leaders' actions do not
conform to their expectations. It is regrettable, however, that
people have used social and religious sentiments to vent their
frustrations disrespecting law and order. Then we wonder what is
really happening to the Indonesian people who usually take pride
in being tolerant and friendly. What about the implementation of
Pancasila philosophy?
The well-documented July 27 riots in Jakarta last year was
triggered by the forceful takeover of the PDI headquarters by
government-backed rival groups. In an opening speech of the House
session earlier this year, Speaker Wahono said the authorities
should prioritize preventive measures in handling social
problems, so as not to unduly anger people. The repressive
approach should be used only as a last resort.
He added that authorities and the public should use their
common sense, instead of taking the law in their own hands. Also
government officials should give practical examples rather than
making statements on how to preserve national unity.
We cannot blame the media or the public for blowing the issue
of wealth disparity out of proportion. Disparities in wealth
exist all over the world. It is true that social disparities are
not entirely to blame for the recent disturbances.
But it is time the government was sensitive to criticisms and
suggestions and deeply examined the social ills. We should be
wise, gentle and responsible in judging the situations that
develop in society and should strive to create peace and order.
ALOYSIUS HARYONO
Jakarta