Racial issue

Readers' responses to Mr. Masli Arman's article (July 30) are very encouraging. Indonesians starting to discuss and debate various issues regarding indigenous-ethic Chinese relationships. Guided by The Jakarta Post's editorial skill, the exchange will somehow reach a point where these Indonesians will find a musyawarah (consultations to reach unanimity), their very own way of negotiating a dispute.

If Mr. Zatni Arbi is no longer offended by words like Padang Bengkok (unscrupulous Padang people) in Your Letters, July 31, I am sure dasar Cina (typically Chinese) or typically pribumi (Your Letters, June 23) will become a thing of the past.

People may not agree with Mr. Arman's views in his article, but he too has a right to his opinion. Democracy works both ways. Other Indonesians may even take this opportunity to explain to him (as Mr. Arbi did) the way things should be for a better Indonesia.

But what is misplaced is Mr. Dean Boulding's Demeaning article (July 31) on Mr. Arman's view which instructed the Post not to publish any more such articles.

During this time when the spirit of reform is at its peak, this fellow wants to go back to the era where Indonesians should only speak what the powerful people want to hear. I say, this is ridiculous. Given the power, I believe Mr. Boulding would kidnap and shoot people who speak against him.

PONG C. POLICAR

Jakarta