Quite a revelation

I only realized a few days ago how naive and stupid I was in the political world of my country. I practically know nothing about hidden motives to become a member of our prestigious and honorable House of Representatives (DPR).

I thought that members of the DPR are idealists who sacrifice their time and effort to fight for the sake of the people's welfare -- that is until a few days ago when I read some newspaper reports about DPR diseases which affect some DPR members.

This was the very first time I learned about the five Ds (datang, duduk, dengar, diam, duit) which mean come-sit-listen- keep silent-money. I also learned about ATM (asal tutup mulut -- as long as you keep your mouth shut) and about "wet" and "dry" commissions.

The five Ds and ATM are to ensure that one will survive a full period as a DPR member and not be recalled sometime during the middle of the term -- one must avoid being "vocal" which displeases certain groups. This only means that one is required to be present and sit down with a serious face as if listening and understanding what is going on, while in fact many are sleeping.

Where is the idealism? What about the vows taken to fight for the people's interest? These kinds of members (luckily they belong to a very rare species) are only thinking about themselves, the prestige they receive, how much money they can get, and many other facilities they can enjoy. Its a very tragic situation indeed. I hope this will fade away and ultimately disappear like the forest fires.

In official circles, I know about the term "wet" and "dry." When one works in a "wet" position, extra income can be earned to become rich in no time by manipulating regulations, corruption and other unlawful means. "Dry" means exactly the opposite because there is no chance to earn extra money -- when leaving a "dry" position, one is as poor as when entering the office.

Merdeka reported about an overwhelming desire of DPR members to join Commissions III, IV and V, which are known to be "wet". It was reported that the problems lie in the recruitment process where nepotism is imminent.

But what surprises me is that a certain gentleman claimed that the struggle to be included in the "wet" commissions are by individuals and a normal practice. How is that possible? I am getting more confused!

SOEGIH ARTO

Jakarta