Pertamina to lose monopoly in 2 years
Pertamina to lose monopoly in 2 years
JAKARTA (JP): The government will end the monopoly extended to
state company Pertamina to manage the country's oil and gas
sector in two years, a minister has said.
Acting Minister of Mines and Energy Akbar Tandjung, who is
also Minister/State Secretary, said on Wednesday that after the
time had elapsed, Pertamina would operate as a limited liability
company.
The two-year period stipulated in the oil and gas bill,
currently being deliberated by the House of Representatives, is
long enough for Pertamina to restructure itself, Akbar said.
The House's largest faction, Golkar, citing the economic
crisis, said the time frame was inadequate for the company to
relinquish its decade-long monopoly and become a limited
liability company.
Earlier this month, Golkar, in a first plenary meeting to
deliberate the oil and gas bill, called on the government to
allow Pertamina to carry out the restructuring "gradually and in
a systematic way".
The House's second largest faction the United Development
Party (PPP), also expressed concerns during the first plenary
session. It said rapid restructuring, at a time when the country
was suffering economic doldrums, would force the company to lay
off some of its 30,000 employees.
On Wednesday, during the second plenary session on the bill,
Akbar said the government did not intend to extend the
restructuring period.
"The transition period determined for the oil and gas bill has
taken several factors into consideration, including asset
recapitulation, change in the company's status and change in the
(oil and gas) contracts."
Pertamina president Martiono Hadianto, earlier promised that
all employees would be safe from lay-offs during the economic
crisis.
The bill will amend the 1971 law, which grants privilege
rights to Pertamina to manage the country's oil and gas sector.
The draft bill, which will lift Pertamina's monopoly on the
oil and gas downstream sector, and revoke its rights to regulate
the country's oil and gas industry, has sparked controversy.
Most factions in the House, including Golkar, the Armed Forces
(ABRI) and the Indonesian Democratic Party (PDI), have expressed
support for the bill, except for several points which they
dismiss as too progressive and liberal.
They agree that by eliminating Pertamina's monopoly, the
country's oil and gas industry will become more efficient.
Corrupt practices, allegedly rampant at Pertamina during the
32-year administration of former president Soeharto, would then
stop.
PPP was the only faction that did not accept the government's
plan to lift Pertamina's monopoly.
The faction feared that opening the downstream sector would
lead to increased fuel prices.
Additionally, it did not believe that corruption in the
country's oil and gas industry would end if governmental
officials take over the monopoly.
Akbar said the government hoped that with the elimination of
Pertamina's monopoly, the country's oil and gas industry would be
free from corruption and be more efficient.
"The oil and gas bill is to make the country's oil and gas
sector transparent and free of monopolistic practices, so that
corruption, collusion and nepotism will be prevented."
In the first plenary session, Golkar also expressed
reservations about the government's plan to allow foreign oil and
gas companies to adopt oil and gas contracts other than the
current obligatory production sharing contract (PSC) system.
However, Akbar said on Tuesday the government was happy with
the contract scheme.
"For the moment, the government has no intention to change the
PSC system, which has been relatively well accepted (by foreign
oil and gas contractors)."
He emphasized that the government did not oblige contractors
to adopt the PSC system in the bill, in order to anticipate
developments in the world's oil and gas industry in the next
several decades.
"Given that the law is expected to last for a long time, the
government finds it necessary to be flexible in regulating (the
oil and gas sector), to allow creativity and dynamism in planning
and the creation of various types of contracts beneficial to the
government," Akbar said. (jsk)