Nuclear testing

In the face of worldwide protest the French government continues preparations for more nuclear testing in the Pacific. Throughout the debate on this issue I have never heard answers to two simple and, I believe, relevant questions.

Firstly, why are nuclear tests necessary? Is it necessary to further refine and improve the destructive and deterrent effect of bombs which so horrified the world 50 years ago in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

Secondly, if the testing is as harmless to both people and the environment as the French government repeatedly states, then why is it not carried out in France instead of on a colonial outpost whose inhabitants, along with those of nearby countries, are so obviously opposed to such tests?

I expect the French authorities have answers to my questions and look forward to a reply from a French Embassy representative.

HUGH COLLETT

Jakarta