Thu, 05 Dec 2002

New anticorruption commission hailed

Tiarma Siboro and Fabiola Desy Unidjaja, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta

Analysts hailed the newly endorsed law on the establishment of a powerful anticorruption commission as a breakthrough in the drawn-out fight against corruption, rampant among public servants and state officials.

Noted legal expert Achmad Ali and Indonesian Corruption Watch (ICW) coordinator Teten Masduki said the legislation was really a great leap in the national movement against corruption, but the election of its members would be a crucial issue because its effectiveness would partly depend on its composition.

"This is a major breakthrough, but to ensure the effectiveness of such a commission we have to elect as its members people with a high level of credibility in fighting corruption," Teten told The Jakarta Post by telephone on Wednesday.

According to the law, the commission, which will have five members, will have full authority to investigate all cases of corruption involving state officials and prosecute them in court.

Achmad Ali, also a senior lecturer of Makassar-based Hassanudin University, underlined the importance of public participation in the election of independent figures to sit on the commission.

"Should the President and the House of Representatives fail to follow these criteria, I doubt whether the bill -- which, in reality, is good enough -- will be effective," Achmad Ali told the Post.

The law, which has yet to be enacted by the President, grants the commission authority to obtain information, arrest suspected corruptors and seize anything necessary to carry out their investigation.

Besides, the commission also has authority to examine bank accounts, prohibit corruption suspects and ask for the suspension of state officials suspected of corruption of Rp 1 billion (US$ 1111,000) or more.

The commission will also be allowed to take over existing corruption cases being dealt with by the police or the attorney general's office.

The law requires all commission members to have a wide knowledge of the law and a minimum of 15 years' professional experience in the legal field.

Regarding prosecution, the law refers to Law No. 20/2001 on corruption, which allows for a reversal in the burden of proof in corruption cases.

The cases to be handled by the commission will be taken to an ad hoc court, with a panel of three ad hoc and two career judges.

Achmad also mentioned that to keep the commission clean, its members and staff would have to be paid salaries sufficient to ensure the welfare of their families.

Both analysts were of the opinion that the commission would represent a challenge to the police, the attorney general's office and prosecutors in investigating corruption cases.

"Many doubt that the commission's tasks will overlap with the tasks carried out by the police and prosecutors. But to me, the need for the commission simply indicates the failure of these two institutions," Achmad, also a member of the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM), said.