Much-maligned ABRI

The province of Aceh is once again the center of Indonesian political attention. This is because of the Wibawa military operation and the attack of soldiers on unarmed civilians, which caused the death of at least four and wounded many more. This is to be regretted and should be condemned by all law-abiding citizens.

The National Committee on Human Rights and several other organizations have sent people to Aceh to investigate. And what mistakes the military people have committed; reports fill the newspapers and airwaves.

I have listened carefully to all the reports and found something missing. I have the impression that detailed reports are released only about the casualties suffered by the people, but little is reported on what caused the government to launch the military operation in the first place.

There is also scant reporting about the kidnapping of the unarmed soldiers returning home to see their families. They were ambushed; several were killed and one marine major is still held hostage. When soldiers or other members of the Armed Forces (ABRI) are wounded or killed, the public considers it normal and not a violation of human rights, even when those soldiers are unarmed and off-duty. Very little is reported in the media and usually nobody is asked to bear the responsibility.

In Merdeka daily on Jan. 12, 1999, on page 1, it was written "Bring the torturers of Acehnese civilians to a lightning trial. This was asked by prominent Aceh leaders. Even Armed Forces Commander Gen. Wiranto has extended his sincere apologies for what has happened, and ordered stern actions to be taken. But I fail to find any reaction toward the Acehnese who ambushed and killed the unarmed soldiers and are holding the marine hostage. This shows how deep the hatred of the people is toward ABRI.

Poor soldiers! This is quite different, of course, with civilians. They should be protected at all cost. No harm should come to them, even when their acts violate the law.

If looting occurs, then it is completely the fault of the police officers who are unable to maintain law and order. If demonstrators break down the gate of the House of Representatives, which is the government's property and so owned by the people, it is considered normal and no uproar is forthcoming.

I have the impression ABRI can do no right in the eyes of the people. In the case of Aceh, the students may ask the ABRI commander for explanations and to be responsible for incident. I think this is normal and acceptable.

I am the first to admit that ABRI committed acts which should have been avoided. But is it that bad? I am sure ABRI has performed good services which should not be forgotten just like that. Under Soeharto's leadership ABRI, as a tool of the people, did what was asked of it. One of ABRI's doctrines clearly states "what is good for the people is good for ABRI".

You could say that ABRI was the victim of the political situation, which nobody liked but nobody dared to fight. Fortunately, students with their great courage, dedication and sacrifices managed to change the situation and spearhead reform.

SOEGIH ARTO

Jakarta