Local democracy lives
Local democracy lives
A month into the direct regional elections, both predictable
and interesting results have been observed.
In spite of some shortcomings, which are only to be expected
in such a comprehensive undertaking, the elections have proceeded
smoothly. The titanic task of preparing for the polls was
accomplished. Few clashes between rival groups have been
reported, and, in most cases, the vote counting itself has been
carried out transparently.
This goes to show that, in the absence of deliberate abuse, a
thorough electoral system can ensure a free and fair election.
Moreover, with additional improvements in the coming years, the
quality of elections will improve.
These elections demonstrate that open political competition at
the grass roots need not end in vain confrontation, and that the
people in rural areas and villages are mature enough to embrace
democracy.
This should come as no surprise. Local villagers are
accustomed to electing their chiefs, as they have done so for
decades. Those who questioned the effectiveness of such a
utilitarian process simply had a political agenda.
Local elections are part and parcel of regional autonomy. They
cement this nation's genuine desire never again to impose the
political will of an elitist regime on less powerful people in
the regions.
They breed accountability and bring democracy back to the
people. For those regions that have succeeded in electing their
chosen leader and fully implemented autonomy, their fate lies
largely in their hands.
Some important trends can be detected in the wake of the first
month of these elections.
The first is that major political parties and established
organizations remain a force to be reckoned with. Their well-
oiled political machinery gives them an advantage over
independent candidates from smaller parties in reaching the
masses, many of whom are still easily influenced by past voting
habits and clever campaigning.
The second is that in spite of these parties' power, there are
areas in which voters are making more rational choices.
The imminent election of Gamawan Fauzi as West Sumatra
governor is a victory for those seeking good governance. Gamawan
defeated candidates from the Golkar Party, and another who is
affiliated with Muslim organization Muhammadiyah, which has a
strong presence in the province.
Gamawan is a native West Sumatran who lives in the province --
compared to others who may be ethnic West Sumatrans but spend
most of their time in Jakarta -- serving as regent of Solok. Last
year he was presented with the Bung Hatta Anticorruption Award
for his "clean" governance.
Gamawan's victory is the clearest sign that people want
leaders who are not only capable but trustworthy.
The Solok regent's success is another indication of how future
leaders will be born. To climb the political ladder, one does not
necessarily have to stoop to dubious practices, or bow to the
whims of Jakarta's elite.
The third trend apparent in these elections is the relatively
"low" voter turnout compared to last year's legislative and
presidential elections. While the numbers have not (as yet)
raised alarm bells, this trend needs to be monitored.
Overall, voter turnout averaged around 70 percent, which, in
established democracies, would be considered a triumph.
In Indonesia's case, the reason for the decline has not been
determined. It could be a case of voter fatigue after last year's
legislative and presidential elections. However, it could also be
a consequence of voter apathy. Perhaps the voters felt no empathy
with the candidates in question, or maybe they had lost faith in
the process after hearing so many promises last year.
Whatever the case, it is a challenge that must be resolved.
Democracy will only survive if the process is made relevant to
the people, a task that rests with people like Gamawan.