Local and foreign observers differ on poll assessment
Local and foreign observers differ on poll assessment
M. Taufiqurrahman, Jakarta
While local observers declined to call the July 5 polls free and
fair, the Carter Center and other foreign monitoring teams said
on Wednesday that they were impressed by the way in which the
election had proceeded.
"It was an honest, fair and safe election," former U.S.
president Jimmy Carter, who chairs the center, announced after a
15-minute meeting with President Megawati Soekarnoputri.
He said, despite some minor problems, the Carter Center
considered that the electoral process was honest and transparent,
overall. "We are particularly grateful that it has been safe,"
Carter added.
Similar praise was aired by the delegation of the European
Union (EU), which also met with Megawati on Wednesday, and the
Washington-based National Democratic Institute (NDI).
"The presidency takes the opportunity to commend the people
and government of Indonesia for the generally peaceful and open
manner in which this round has taken place, and expresses
confidence that these elections will contribute to the deepening
of the democratic process in Indonesia," said a statement from
the Dutch government, as president of the EU, released to The
Jakarta Post.
NDI director Paul Rowland also lauded the peaceful election.
"The KPU (General Elections Commission) and political parties
should be congratulated. But, Indonesians deserve much credit as
they had the responsibility to show their leaders where they want
to go," he said.
He said the direct election was a remarkable indication of
progress in Indonesia, which has been struggling for six years in
its transition to democracy.
"This is the largest direct presidential election in the
world. It is the first for Indonesia and ran quite smoothly -- so
far," Rowland said.
Carter also said the KPU deserved credit for undertaking such
a huge task.
However, he criticized the commission over the double-puncture
debacle, which spoiled the positive mood of the election.
"The commission made a serious mistake in that it did not
anticipate the problem of dual punctures," he said.
Carter said the election marked another important step in
Indonesia's democratic consolidation. "In just a few years,
Indonesia has made a dramatic transition from authoritarian rule
to democracy," he added.
The Carter Center said it would issue a more comprehensive
report on the overall electoral process.
The reports of local independent observers, however, were not
so glowing. Earlier on Wednesday, the Center for Electoral Reform
(Cetro), the People's Network for Voter Education (JPPR) and the
People's Network for Elections Monitoring (JAMPPI) claimed the
electoral process was far from free and fair.
"One of many indications of whether an election is fair is
that equal treatment is given to candidates at polling stations.
We do not believe that transpired," Cetro executive director
Smita Notosusanto said.
In a joint statement, the independent observers said
irregularities had also marred the July 5 election.
In their preliminary analysis, the election teams discovered a
great number of unregistered voters, who poll committees (PPS)
allowed to vote.
Cetro, in its observation, found that 32 percent of voters in
over 1,400 polling stations were permitted to vote, even though
they were not registered.
The JPPR found that, at over 1,200 polling stations, 10
percent of voters were "intimidated" by other voters, campaign
teams and poll committees.
The three poll watchdogs had deployed over 130,000 observers
to monitor the presidential election across the country.