Thu, 29 Aug 2002

JP/3/CHATIB

Corruption a constraint to achieving tax revenue target

The government, under its budget plan recently proposed to the legislature aims to increase its total tax and excise revenue by 18.7 percent to Rp 260.78 trillion (nearly US$30 billion) next year from Rp 219.62 trillion expected this year. Muhammad Chatib Basri, associate director of the University of Indonesia's Institute for Economic and Social Research (LPEM), talked to The Jakarta Post contributor Rikza Abdullah.

Question: Is the government's target of increasing its revenue from taxes and excise by 18.7 percent next year realistic?

Answer: The targeted revenue of Rp 260.78 trillion for 2003 is still too low because it will amount to only 13.3 percent of the country's gross domestic product (GDP) (projected to reach Rp 1,955.47 trillion that year). This will indicate a slight increase from this year's target of Rp 219.62 trillion, which will be 13 percent of the GDP (projected at Rp 1,685.38 trillion). In other countries tax collection can exceed 15 percent of their GDPs.

But the 2003 target would be very difficult to achieve if the government did not intensify its tax collection and improve its tax administration. The current poor tax collection has made it easy for companies and people to avoid tax payment, while the poor tax administration has made it possible for tax officials and taxpayers to collaborate in corruption.

So, the expected increase in tax revenue will be reasonable if the tax collection is intensified and the tax administration is improved.

Which is the larger amount, the amount of money siphoned off by tax officials or the amount that should have been paid by tax evaders?

Maybe it's the amount of money siphoned off by tax officials. But that will surely depend on each case. Some taxpayer, who does not want to pay an income tax of Rp 600 million, would prefer to pay Rp 150 million (as a bribe) to tax officials so he could pay only Rp 50 million for the tax.

How can the government, with such a condition, expect that the country's economy will grow by 5 percent in 2003?

The expectation of the GDP to grow by 5 percent in 2003 does not make sense to me. But my consideration is not related to the planned increase in tax collection and reduction of subsidies because the impact of energy (fuel and electricity) price increases is not substantial and the planned increase in tax collection is not significant.

Because the country's GDP grew by 3.3 percent in 2001, when the world economy was slowing down, it is reasonable if we expect the GDP to grow by 3.8 percent this year due to improvement in the world economy.

But it would be unrealistic if we project the GDP to expand drastically to reach 5 percent in 2003 with no improvement in investment. Domestic investment will not increase significantly that year because banks are still reluctant to channel credits to companies, while foreign investors are scared to enter Indonesia due to social and labor unrest as well as business uncertainty.

How far will the GDP grow?

Based on the optimistic scenario by the LPEM, the GDP is likely to grow by 4.4 percent in 2003.

Is it realistic for the government to increase its revenue from income taxes on non-oil sectors by 27 percent for 2002?

It would be too hard. Its success will depend mostly on whether the government can identify and force tax evaders to pay their income taxes and all tax officials to pass on all income tax payments to the state treasury. Corruption related to the collection of income taxes is relatively easier and larger in the amounts of money involved than that related to value added tax.

Many business people, therefore, complain on corruption related to income tax. Some executives of the 1,700 companies surveyed by the LPEM recently said they would rather allow the government to impose an extra tax of some 7 percent to 8 percent on their incomes than to pay bribes, which can reach 10 percent of their incomes, to corrupt tax officials.

How can the government expect its revenue from value added tax (VAT) to increase by 17.1 percent to Rp 82 trillion in 2003 ?

This target is easy to achieve because domestic consumption is likely to continue growing at an annual rate of 6 percent and, therefore, will remain strong. The planned reduction of subsidies will not boost inflation because the country's inflation is influenced more by the fluctuations of the rupiah's value than the movements of fuel prices.

The recent experience indicates that the inflation rate was on a downward trend in the months following fuel price increases in January, because the rupiah's value appreciated against the U.S. dollar.

Will the smuggling of manufactured goods into the country affect the VAT revenue target?

The smuggling of manufactured goods will affect domestic producers, who have to pay taxes, in competing against such untaxed imported products. But it is unlikely to cause VAT collection to fall short of the target.

The targeted revenue of Rp 82 trillion, which would be equal to about 4.2 percent of the country's GDP, is still too low. The government's VAT revenue should actually be able to reach 8 percent of the country's GDP (projected at Rp 1,955.47 trillion).

Will the government face difficulties in raising its revenue from excise on cigarettes to Rp 27.64 trillion in 2003?

Yes, it will. Even though smokers have a difficult time quitting, their cigarette consumption will decrease when cigarette prices increase. The sales of cigarettes during the first seven months of this year declined due to an increase in price.

How about the government's expectation to increase revenue from import duties to Rp 13.82 trillion from Rp 12.25 trillion, while the country will enter a free trade era in 2003 under the ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (AFTA)?

The government will be able to achieve its expectation because it is expanding the number of commodities subject to import duties, including agricultural produce. However, such a trend is contradictory to the principles of AFTA and the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Perhaps, the expansion on imposition of duties does not violate the AFTA and WTO principles if the rates are still within the allowable range or the affected commodities are excluded from agreements; but the government's inconsistency in trade liberalization should become our concern because it is a setback and may affect domestic economic activities.

Will the government's plan to raise revenue from property taxes increase burdens on taxpayers?

It won't if the government pursues its target merely by intensifying the tax collection. Many have evaded the payment of taxes on land and buildings. The target will burden taxpayers if the government raises the tax rates.