'Jockeys' out, stickers in for Jakarta motorists
'Jockeys' out, stickers in for Jakarta motorists
JAKARTA (JP): The city administration is set to scrap the
"three-in-one" traffic regulation for Jakarta's major
thoroughfares and replace it with car stickers, an official said
yesterday.
Deputy Governor for Administration Affairs Abdul Kahfi said
the stickers had been deemed the best method for collecting
additional revenue.
"For sure the money from the sale of the stickers will be used
to improve public transportation fleets, most of which are
already in bad condition," he said.
Under the new system, motorists who pass through the current
three-in-one zones -- Jl. Thamrin in Central Jakarta and Jl.
Jend. Sudirman and Jl. Gatot Subroto in South Jakarta -- during
the morning peak hours will be required to buy the stickers, he
said.
The three-in-one regulation, which was introduced in 1992,
stipulates that a private car must contain a minimum of three
passengers between 6:30 a.m. and 10 a.m. on work days.
The municipality indicated its intention to abolish the
regulation late last year on the grounds that it is no longer
effective.
The regulation was originally intended to discourage people
from driving their cars to work and encourage them to use public
transport.
But it created a new problem: "jockeys", people who offer
themselves as passengers for a short ride into the restricted
zones and past the police checkpoints for a fee of Rp 1,000 (10
U.S. cents).
Police are virtually powerless to stop the practice, which is
a popular way for boys who go to school in the afternoon to earn
pocket money. But now girls, housewives and even women with
babies have joined the trend.
Sticker price
Kahfi said yesterday he could not reveal when the new policy
would be implemented or the cost of the stickers.
"We are still studying aspects of the sticker system.
"One of the considerations in determining the cost of stickers
is the amount motorists pay to the jockeys."
Kahfi said the administration has invited private companies to
participate in the project but PT Wijaya Wisesa was the only firm
to submit a proposal for the system's implementation.
PT Wijaya Wisesa reportedly proposed that motorists be charged
Rp 5,000 per entry, Rp 8,000 for the entire day and Rp 100,000
for a month.
Kahfi denied allegations that the sticker system was primarily
aimed at boosting city revenue.
"It's purely for improving public transportation".
A member of City Council Commission D for development affairs,
Lukman Mokoginta, said yesterday he supported the system but
disagreed with the involvement of private companies.
"The system is good because the money can be used to improve
public transportation, but it will be better if the
administration manages it alone.
"There are no private companies which have experience in
managing traffic."
Lukman hoped the administration would ensure transparent
reports be made available on the flow of revenue.
"The most important thing is transparency to ensure the fund
is really used for improving public transport."
The sticker fees should not be imposed on public
transportation vehicles, motorcycles or taxis, he said.
However, the system was criticized by Zumrotin K. Soesilo,
executive director of the Indonesian Consumers Foundation (YLKI),
who labeled it a setback in dealing with the city's traffic
problems.
"Why change it into a system in which people have to pay Rp
5,000 to Rp 8,000 or whatever the price will be? It will
certainly place a greater burden on the public."
She said the municipality should not forget the objectives
behind the three-in-one policy.
"The ultimate goal is to reduce traffic congestion, not to
look for more money or to gather funds through the implementation
of some policy."
Zumrotin gave her support to the ongoing enforcement of the
three-in-one system.
"The system has been up and running for quite some time now. I
believe if there are obstacles -- such as jockeys who take
advantage of the system -- the municipality could create some
mechanisms to abolish the problem."
She said it was important to ensure the existing system worked
well.
"Don't divert attention away from the main aim of reducing
traffic jams, by applying a new system that may lead to other
'manipulative action'."
And the three-in-one areas are not toll roads, she added.
"So how can people have to pay to enter public roads?"
(edt/ind)