Indonesian Political, Business & Finance News

Indonesia No. 1 corrupt country?

| Source: JP

Indonesia No. 1 corrupt country?

An interesting article on corruption, as seen by foreign
magazine Der Spiegel, appeared in the Merdeka daily on July 27,
1995. In my opinion it was a serious report. Whether we agree or
disagree with what was reported and the statement that Indonesia
is the No. 1 corrupt country in the world, is another matter.

In my opinion, we should pay serious attention to this report
and not react as Pak TB Silalahi did. He seemed not to realize
the seriousness of corruption in Indonesia, by said, "This is
nothing. It is only their opinion. This kind of news will not
harm Indonesia, because the foreign press is used to launching
such news stories." However, Sabam Sirait, adviser of the
Indonesian Democratic Party, gave different comments, which
befitted a wise and experienced politician.

On the same day, Media Indonesia published the result of
research conducted by the School of Social and Political Science
(FISIP) of the University of Indonesia, under Dr. Kastorius
Sinaga. This report gave a rather dark picture of the problem of
corruption in our country, which leads to a 30 to 45 percent loss
of the development funds. The evaporation of development funds is
the result of the behavior of officials in the bureaucracy. And,
I think, this should be Pak Silalahi's homework.

If we add to this a report on page one of The Jakarta Post,
July 28, 1995, RI's economy remains inefficient, then we really
must pay serious attention. Not panic, or become afraid, but plan
curative actions. According to the governor of the Central Bank,
Soedradjad Djiwandono, Indonesia's economy remains inefficient
because of the high Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR).
These reports, from two bona fide Indonesian institutions, FISIP
of UI and the Central Bank, cannot be ignored, just like that.

To get a correct, non political picture of corruption in
Indonesia, the Attorney General's office should publish a report
on corruption, with data and statistics, while refraining from
giving comments. The Attorney General's office is the most
qualified institution to issue technical data of corruption,
beside, perhaps, the State Audit Board, or the Department of
Finance. The other Departments might be inclined to issue reports
seen through political eyes.

We can follow another way to get correct statistical data. We
can sue Der Spiegel in court for insulting the Republic and force
Der Spiegel to disclose their sources. The Senior Minister, the
Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister of Singapore have
sued the International Herald Tribune and won the case. The IHT
has to pay.

The same can be done in Indonesia. This can only happen when
we feel strong enough and are sure that what was reported in Der
Spiegel was purely fantasy, then we can sue for libel.

I think that the people in general have the right to know the
real situation of corruption, because it is the people's money
that is being corrupted.

SOEGIH ARTO

Jakarta

View JSON | Print