Improving the fire agency
Improving the fire agency
"Fire is a good servant but a bad master." This old proverb
remains very relevant to Jakarta which has seen at least three
big fires since the New Year that has killed seven people.
The most dramatic fire took place last Sunday in Cakung, East
Jakarta, when three people, one of whom was a baby, were trapped
to death in a fire.
For a populous city like Jakarta, fire hazards are everywhere
-- the high-rise buildings and luxurious housing complexes, as
well as slum areas that are packed with houses -- and there are
many factors that make fire a bad master.
Almost all low-income residential areas, or kampung, in
Jakarta, packed with rudimentary houses, reflect no awareness of
fire hazards at all. This is quite understandable. How would one
think of fire prevention if the make-shift house on a 18-square-
meter plot is one's only belonging? For those living in such a
slum area, fire prevention is a very rare and very expensive
need.
Unfortunately, the city administration too has poor awareness
of fire hazards. Who can guarantee that the hydrants installed in
many parts of the city will be operable when a fire breaks out?
Do all high-rise buildings have proper fire exits as required
before the buildings are constructed? There are many such similar
lines of questioning.
The administration's poor attention to the fire department
reflects its half-hearted alacrity in this issue.
With only Rp 2 billion set aside from the 2002 city budget,
the fire department cannot do much to repair their damaged or
worn-out equipment. The fire department now has 150 old fire
engines and 30 ladder trucks. According to the Jakarta Fire
Agency head Johny Pangaribuan, they need 265 fire trucks to cover
a city the size of the capital. Worse still, 15 of the fire
trucks are in poor condition, and some of them are no longer
operable.
While the fire agency has only Rp 2 billion for the
maintenance of its equipment, the administration set aside Rp 80
billion for the beautification of the Monas Park. Decision-makers
should have better priorities.
More surprising is that 65 percent of a total of 2,000
firefighters are over 45 years old, and 30 percent are over 50,
meaning that only 5 percent are of the ideal age of between 20
and 35 years old.
Johny said he could not expect fresh blood to improve the
agency's human resources when the Jakarta administration had
postponed new recruitment in the recent years. "Our personnel are
all civil servants recruited by City Hall," he said.
Last year, Johny told journalists that his office received
some 200 employees of former government institutions, which were
liquidated following the autonomy law. However, all these new
employees are inactive. "Eighty of them are old," Johny said at
that time. People over 50 are less adept at heavy labor, like
that required of firefighters.
The fire department now has a total of some 2,500 employees,
500 of whom are in charge of administrative jobs. While no data
was available for the ideal number of firefighters for a city
with a population of 10 million, 2,000 firefighters have so far
proved insufficient.
What about the salary? A senior firefighter once said that he
received Rp 963,500 each month as his salary, in accordance with
his categorization in the civil service, grade II D. A family of
four would have to survive on that meager sum while we hear that
the Jakarta governor gets Rp 90 million a month for coffee and Rp
65 million for official attire.
Having watched the documentaries on the magnificent job of New
York's firefighters on Sept. 11, 2001, we can only be envious and
dream of having a more professional fire department.
We have to accept the reality that while hardly any of our
children want to be firefighters, many of them dream of becoming
soldiers. This shows that firefighters are not popular here,
despite their heroism in saving people's lives and battling
fires.
So what should the fire agency do to improve their
professionalism? This is what the city administration has
obviously been ignoring for years.
It's time for the city administration to review its stance on
fire fighting by making it one of its priorities, at least in its
annual budget.
Besides suggesting better welfare for firefighters, it is
imperative that the standard requirement for firefighters differ
from that of civil servants. To say the least, firefighters must
be more physically fit than other civil servants. Firefighters
are not employees who sit at their desks or who read newspapers
and play chess in their offices from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., like the
many civil servants that we commonly see.
Given the responsibility of their tasks, firefighters need
basic military training. The city administration must change the
recruitment criteria for firefighters, and set aside more funding
to hire new, young firefighters immediately and give them the
proper training.
Hopefully, in the next decade we will no longer see feeble and
slow firefighters, and spare more people from death by fire.