Indonesian Political, Business & Finance News

How to refill Lake Toba and save its surroundings

| Source: JP

How to refill Lake Toba and save its surroundings

By Pasi Lehmusluoto

JAKARTA (JP): A careful reading of the article, "Renun River
dilemma brought about by deforestation" (The Jakarta Post, Aug.
8, 2000) revealed that the diversion of the Renun River into Lake
Toba, its historical direction, was not planned to raise the
water level of the lake.

The diversion was planned to provide additional electricity
via the PLTA Asahan hydroelectric plant to PT Inalum for its
aluminum production -- at the expense of Lake Toba's environment.
Lake Toba is one of the key sites for the conservation of
freshwater biodiversity in Indonesia.

The government's plan to raise the lake's water level by
diverting the Renun River into it is insufficient, as PLTA Asahan
has planned to drain the additional water at the other end of the
lake to generate electricity.

The only effective means to raise Lake Toba's water level is
to reregulate the operation of PLTA Asahan dam and to bring the
lake's hydrology back to its natural state.

Deforestation in the Lake Toba watershed or even in North
Sumatra does not directly cause the Renun River dilemma. It is
mainly caused by regional and global changes in climate, which
also affect the rainfall in the area.

The National Institute of Aeronautics and Space has stated
that significant climatic changes were brought about by recent
large-scale deforestation in the watershed area and in North
Sumatra. However, deforestation started thousands of years ago
with the clearing of land for agricultural purposes by the
Bataks. There is scientific evidence to back this up. There is
also evidence the Lake Toba surroundings and North Sumatra were
already widely deforested in 1932, more widely than today. Did
those activities cause consequent climatic changes?

The Lake Toba watershed has a vegetation cover, which protects
it from erosion. The ecological fact is that the more forest
there is, the more water escapes into the air by
evapotranspiration. The question is whether this moisture will
ever return as rain to the Lake Toba area?

If the Renun River catchment area were effectively reforested,
it would deliver less water to the river and to Lake Toba.
Reforestation is not an answer, but it helps to maintain the
forest-based natural services and livelihoods in the area.

As said in the article, the Renun River diversion may not be
sufficient to increase Lake Toba's water level or to save the
Renun hydroelectric and PLTA Asahan projects.

From the beginning, the efficient capacity of Lake Toba (i.e.
the difference between the maximum level of the lake and its
minimum level multiplied by the lake's surface area) before PLTA
Asahan started operation was 2.86 km3. This allowed a water flow
from the lake of only 90.7 m3 per second, and a reduction in the
lake's water level by some 2.5 meters.

However, the efficient capacity of the lake has decreased
since PLTA Asahan started to operate the regulating dams in 1982.
The level of Lake Toba and the flow of the Asahan River leading
from the lake is controlled by these dams.

Statistics, which began in 1954, show the reduced rainfall in
the region has significantly decreased the amount of water
flowing into the lake.

The reduced net inflow, high water evaporation rate from the
lake surface and the uncertain hydrological assumptions in the
PLTA Asahan planning has lead to water being released at a higher
rate than the net inflow. The chances of increasing the level of
the lake without a drastic increase in regional rainfall, or a
drastic reduction in the amount of water released by PLTA Asahan,
are limited.

The representative of the Lake Toba Heritage Foundation stated
in the beginning of the article there was still enough time to
save the Renun Hydroelectric Project. What about trying to raise
Lake Toba's water level?

What is really needed to save Lake Toba, the world's largest
crater lake, from deterioration? In the first place the threats
must be known.

The major threats are the release of lake water by PLTA Asahan
at a higher rate than the net inflow, thus lowering the water
level, discharge of waste waters, chemicals used in agriculture,
dumping of waste and garbage, oil spills, exotic fish
introductions affecting existing fish populations, increasing
cage fish farming and excess growth of water hyacinths.

What needs to be done? Lake Toba can be saved if it is
understood that the threats are much closer to the lake than
usually thought. When Lake Toba's water level is brought back to
its pre-PLTA Asahan level and all the other above threats are
adequately removed, there is hope to save Lake Toba for the
generations to come. The pumping of treated waste waters from
Parapat to the Asahan River instead of into the lake should also
be considered. Even the Asahan River flow may increase. improving
the diluting capacity of the river.

Finally, was the planting of pine trees in the watershed as
part of a previous reforestation program the real cause of the
reduction in the number of the endemic "ikan Batak" fish, a kind
of fish that is only found in the lake?

-- Pasi Lehmusluoto, Ph.D. has been working on issues related
to the Indonesian environment since 1974. One of his main
environmental concerns has been bodies of freshwater,
particularly large lakes. He has been promoting sound scientific
approaches in the management of the environment.

View JSON | Print