Graft resurfaces in subdistrict councils
Graft resurfaces in subdistrict councils
The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
Four cases of corruption are suspected to have taken place with
the funds for the subdistrict community empowerment program
(PPMK), disbursed last year and managed by the subdistrict
council, an official said on Friday.
The chairwoman of the City Community Empowerment Board (BPM),
Rohana Manggala, said that the cases of suspected graft, totaling
Rp 195 million and involving four members of four subdistrict
councils, were being investigated by police.
The alleged corruption cases occurred in Kelapa Dua
subdistrict, West Jakarta, involving Rp 94 million, and in three
subdistricts in Central Jakarta: Karet Tengsin, involving Rp 24
million, Paseban, involving Rp 67 million, and Bungur, involving
Rp 10 million.
Only one graft case was detected with the program's funds in
2001, but it involved a significant amount of money -- Rp 719
million. The case occurred in the Serdang subdistrict, also in
Central Jakarta.
"All the cases were discovered as a result of people's tips
about irregularities they noticed," Rohana said.
Observers said these findings were only the tip of the iceberg
and there were more irregularities in the management of PPMK's
funds.
Amid the irregularities, the city administration will raise
the amount of PPMK funding for each subdistrict from Rp 250
million last year to Rp 500 million this year.
The fund will be disbursed later this year.
Rohana also said her office had found Rp 4 billion of bad
debts from a total of Rp 60 billion of PPMK funds disbursed last
year.
She added that there were subdistricts which had bad debts
amounting to more than 50 percent of the fund. In that case, the
city administration will not disburse funds to subdistricts whose
debt load amounts to more than 50 percent.
Tubagus Haryokarbianto of the Jakarta Legal Aid Institute
(LBH) said separately that the subdistrict council should
supervise the implementation of the program, not manage it.
Tubagus accused the city administration of trying to co-opt
the public figures in the subdistricts by asking the council to
manage the fund. With the implementation of the policy, it is
expected that the subdistrict council will not criticize the city
administration.
City Hall spokesman Muhayat, however, defended the policy,
saying that it was part of the city's efforts to empower all
elements of the subdistricts.
"If we allow subdistrict heads to manage the PPMK's funds, it
would be a setback," Muhayat said, adding that in trying to
reduce the irregularities, the subdistrict heads would be
involved in the supervision.