Government told not to worry about House's criticism
Government told not to worry about House's criticism
JAKARTA (JP): The House of Representatives called on the
administration not to be averse to criticism from the legislative
body, saying such censure was a normal democratic process aimed
at ensuring a system of checks and balances which was lacking in
past administrations.
House Speaker Akbar Tandjung, in his progress report to the
People's Consultative Assembly on Monday, said the House was
merely performing its control function.
"There has been concern that the government will loose its
prestige amid the House's increasing criticism of the executive's
performance. With its functions, tasks and power, the House only
wants to establish a stable and democratic government," Akbar
said.
He said the political elite should also exercise statesmanship
in responding to issues, while all state institutions should
remain critical of each other in the spirit of unity.
He reminded those present that part of the reform agenda was
to reinvigorate state institutions, including empowering the
House.
"Democracy can be upheld only if the system of checks and
balances between the House and the administration is accepted,"
he said.
Akbar therefore maintained that differences of opinion between
the administration and the House should be perceived as a normal
part of democracy.
Laws
Akbar, who is also chairman of Golkar Party, said that during
the 1999/2000 fiscal year, the House deliberated 36 draft laws,
22 of which had been sent to the President for ratification.
"The House also used its initiative to prepare draft laws on
the development of new provinces and another one on bank credits.
It also deliberated several other draft laws resulting from the
separation of the National Police and the Indonesian Military,"
he said.
He said the House also was preparing a code of ethics for its
members, adding that together with the administration the House
was deliberating a National Development Program for the 1999 to
2004 period.
Akbar also revealed that a number of legislators had proposed
the House lodge a petition demanding President Abdurrahman Wahid
explain the reason behind his dismissal of two economic ministers
in April.
He also said a number of legislators proposed investigations
be opened into the Bulog and Brunei scandals, and the alleged
embezzlement of nonbudgetary funds from the State Logistics
Agency.
"The investigations can be carried out in the House's next
sitting," he said.
Akbar then called on the administration to focus fully on
resolving the country's economic crisis, which he described as a
major source of the nation's problems.
"The House is of the opinion that our work will be easier in
the future and the political situation will return to normal if
we succeed in coping with the economic problems," he said.
The House's progress report generally won the endorsement of
regional and interest groups representatives in the Assembly.
Freddy Latumahina, a regional representative from Maluku, said
the House's progress report answered speculation that it was
embroiled in a malicious spat with the administration.
"The House's progress report was a sincere acknowledgment that
criticism fired by legislators are aimed at empowering the
legislative body and not at discrediting the government.
"The House should continue to be encouraged to perform its
control function," he said.
Valina Singka Subekti, an interest group representative,
agreed with Freddy, but said she was skeptical the Assembly, the
majority of whose members also are House members, would be able
to evaluate the progress report objectively.
Valina further questioned the political motives behind the
House's recent interpellation motion, saying the House should not
have questioned the President over issues such as the dismissal
of the two ministers, but on more pressing matters such as the
prolonged violence in Aceh and Maluku.
"Legislators should not use their interpellation right on
minor cases but on national problems," she said. (rms/jun)