Globalization

Is globalization, in other words "interdependence" between nations, the solution to creating a just and more efficient world? In my opinion it is delusive to believe that "globalization or interdependence" is synonymous with justice or equity because it conceals the linking of the weaker nations to the stronger ones, in economic and technological terms in a kind of modus vivendi.

It must be clear to everybody that the world's business system demands a global supermarket and a global clientele. No wonder "globalization" has become the keyword. But will it solve age-old problems and the new ones humanity faces?

When taking information technology as an example in this discussion, we see the rich countries moving so fast the poorer countries can only try to keep up with them. Catching up seems rather impossible. And even if it were possible one wonders if it would be meaningful for independent national development because it remains a fact that nations want to be independent and sovereign in making choices based on their own identity.

The wave of information -- and communication -- systems brought to us in the last decade also introduced information poverty. The "information poor" who have no access to these systems present a new and large dimension to already existing social disparities.

To become globalized with the assumption of creating an anti- parochial, broad-minded, civilized World Order, is therefore nothing else but another method used by smart business tycoons, ambiguous politicians and intelligent people in society. Without added values "globalization or interdependence" will not be enough for the greater part of humanity to survive.

INGRID COSIJN-MITRASING

Palembang, South Sumatra