Getting it straight: Navel temptations vs gender equality
Getting it straight: Navel temptations vs gender equality
Ati Nurbaiti, The Jakarta Post
Toward the end of this year, we were treated to the laments of
President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who is beginning to show a
sagely side to his personality: He expressed his regret over the
many broadcasts that were "alien to Indonesia's norms and
identity".
Initially, a minister referred to the "navel", a reference to
MTV crooners and their wannabes. A few days later, Susilo
identified his concern: pornografi and pornoaksi.
While the first term refers to anything close to pornography
("I know it when I see it,") -- the second is used more
specifically with regard to "actions or broadcasting of actions
of a pornographic nature".
The President was evidently unaware of media coverage
expressing confidence in his leadership, and that while he might
have a personal dislike of images of bellybuttons because they
disturb his moral fiber, he would surely be able to separate his
personal preferences from state policy.
Reiterating his concerns over the sexual lure of the navel --
tucked away in a woman's abdomen, we presume -- did not do much
to boost his popularity ratings.
Nonetheless, something good may come out of this: In recalling
that Susilo pledged to listen to the people, he and his Cabinet
need only consult women on this particular issue. After all,
women have been the subjects -- or more precisely, the victims --
of policies on morale and reasserting the national or local
"identity".
Women should be pleased with policies supposedly drawn up to
make us a more decent nation. Even if corruption may top the 100-
day program, banning pornoaksi would at least be the first step
in making women more dignified -- even if it means jailing models
who pose in the buff.
Let us not delve into the overlapping issue of freedom of
expression here, nor of parental guidance ratings on films such
as The Little Mermaid and Aladdin that feature bellybutton-
baring, singing princesses.
In past heated furors over porn, feminists and media activists
have cited their experience that it usually took the mere banning
of a sensual -- or sensuous -- singer to cause a domino-effect
censorship in other issues.
A new report, Menggalang Perubahan (Mobilizing Change),
published by the Women's Journal Foundation (Yayasan Jurnal
Perempuan) puts forth other reasons as to why not all women
appreciate "morality policies".
Featuring case studies from Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam, West
Sumatra and West Java, the report looks into earlier complaints
from women on local policies that mainly make a fuss over their
dress and appropriate curfew -- all for "their own good", as
women are said to invite all kinds of sin by exposing themselves.
In Aceh, society is governed according to sharia, and
activists have pointed to what they see as more urgent issues
relevant to enforcing the spirit of Islam: wanton murder and
corruption, the greatest threat to the Acehnese people.
In short, these women are illuminating issues that are more
pertinent and in need of government and public attention than the
fierce guarding of the moral and spiritual fiber of men under the
guise of preserving the chastity of women.
The trend of enforcing morality regulations -- made suddenly
possible with the power vested in regional autonomy -- is
somewhat withdrawing in the regions. But, notes Adriana Venny, an
editor of the above report, this was only because the policy had
become associated with religious fundamentalism, which had lost
its attractiveness following several terrorist bombings.
A priority for next year would be measure our progress,
stagnancy or setback regarding a number of goals that the nation
had agreed to fulfill along with the international community,
including the well-being and welfare of women.
The year 2005 is the time set to evaluate our progress in
achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which was
launched at the 2000 United Nations Millennium Summit in New York
and of which Indonesia is a signatory.
The eight MDGs are: eradicate extreme hunger and poverty;
achieve universal basic education; promote gender equality;
reduce child mortality; improve maternal health; combat HIV/AIDS,
malaria and other diseases; ensure environmental sustainability;
and develop a global partnership for development.
Gender equality is seen as vital to achieving the other goals,
which is why the UN hailed Indonesia's progress in elementary
education: Official figures suggest that, in recent years, the
enrollment of girls at elementary and junior high schools has
risen to become more or less equal to that of boys.
Yet, instilling a basic understanding of the importance of
gender equality in society -- from the grassroots to the upper
tiers -- seems to be a big job, if policies such as those
restricting women's movement exist on paper, if not in practice.
In the name of reasserting the original "identities" of the
provinces and regions via policy -- apparently designed without
the input of local women -- restrictions on women have become the
main indicator of a region's "identity" and the simplest way of
displaying it. So far, it seems this "identity" is anything but
what the local elite aspires or claims it to be -- both religious
and upholding "traditional" values.
The basic message seems to be: Our women are not on the
streets at night, therefore we're religious, and though this
might be merely symbolic, it's a start to tackling other issues;
handling corruption can come later.
As in Aceh, however, there is no certainty as to how long
local policy will take to evolve from harassing and punishing
improperly dressed women to prosecuting corruptors. Then again,
if the sharia was really imposed on corruptors and their hands
were cut off, an Aceh official once confided to The Jakarta Post
that "none of the officials would have hands".
Adriana and Gadis Arivia, another editor of the above report,
stress the need for widespread education on gender equality as a
fundamental principle -- which would mean getting rid of all
policies that could impede this right.
Actually, this issue is clearly defined in the MDG convention,
but local policy makers have apparently not been informed of its
ratification and what that would entail.
The convention notes that state parties are "to take all
appropriate measures, including legislation, to modify or abolish
existing laws, regulations, customs and practices which
constitute discrimination against women". This means that even if
women in Bali agreed to revive the ancient custom of self-
immolation following their husbands' deaths -- such a move would
be in violation of the convention's spirit of human rights.
The human species is not homogeneous. The loyalties and
interests of women CEOs and workers, and the wives of the rich
and powerful are worlds apart, which complicates the task of do-
gooders such as the National Commission of Violence Against Women
(Komnas Perempuan) and its vast network of local women's
organizations. Many "solidarity" campaigns are still needed to
round up the support of women -- and men -- at least against
discrimination, violence and harassment of women.
These are the constraints at the heart of our achieving gender
equality, a vital part of the MDGs to which we agreed. In
evaluating this goal in the coming year and drawing up policies
to ensure progress on this issue, President Susilo needs only to
listen to the experience of women -- and put aside his noble
intentions to save us from overexposure to that pornographic
bellybutton.
Sidebar
Ahead of the five-year review of the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs) in 2005, the United Nations Development Fund for
Women (Unifem) has outlined four focus areas crucial to achieving
gender equality and women's empowerment. These two issues are
considered vital to supporting other MDGs, including reducing
extreme poverty by 2015.
2005 focus areas:
o Reducing "feminized poverty"
o Ending violence against women
o Reversing the spread of HIV/AIDS among women and girls
o Achieving gender equality in democratic governance in times of
peace as well as war
"Feminized poverty" refers to the dominant face of women among
the poor, such as among our migrant workers, whose contributions
have become more important since the 1997 economic crisis in
alleviating poverty and unemployment in their families.
The Office of the State Minister of Women's Empowerment has
announced its first-100 days program, which also includes
increasing the economic welfare of women, "evaluating" the
migrant repatriation process and increasing counseling and other
services for women and children in conflict areas.
While details are yet to be provided, in light of reviewing
Indonesia's commitment to the MDG, our policies -- or lack
thereof -- in several areas should also be evaluated.
Among these are:
o Migrant workers
Women, mostly working as domestic help, have made up 90 percent
of Indonesian migrant workers in recent years. As of March 2004,
more than 80,000 migrant workers sent home over US$425 million in
earnings. Progress has been slow in raising awareness as to their
rights and the responsibilities of the government and host
countries, in addition to those of labor agencies and employers.
o Domestic help
While there is still much to be done regarding migrant workers,
particularly in their protection, another key issue is minimum
wage for maids and other domestic help, and whether a monthly
wage higher than, say, Rp 250,000 ($27.80), would make this a
more attractive occupation compared to migrating overseas to earn
at least Rp 1 million for similar work. But discriminatory
perceptions, for example that maids cannot be regulated as they
are "unskilled" and thus fall into the "informal sector", have
contributed to the continued absence of minimum wage regulations
for domestic work.
o Implementation of law on domestic violence
New data from Jakarta-based women's shelter Mitra Perempuan (MP)
shows that in over 80 percent of the 200 reported domestic
violence cases it has received, the perpetrators are husbands,
ex-husbands and other relatives. MP believes the figure is merely
the tip of the iceberg.
o Conflict areas
Providing counseling to victims of violence among women and
children is only one of the basic services needed in conflict
areas like Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam, where military operations
have continued for the past 18 months. Acehnese have reiterated
an urgent need for public space so that various groups, including
women, could express their concerns, including freedom from fear
of intimidation and violence from both sides of the conflict.
o Continuing safe sex campaigns
Despite information campaigns on the higher vulnerability of
women to HIV, HIV/AIDS workers and activists cite the refusal of
men to wear condoms, among others, as major contributing factors.
National estimates as of November showed that HIV-positive women
made up 21 percent of the 5,701 reported cases, many of whom said
they found out belatedly that their spouses were infected.
o Women's participation in decision making
The presence of only 61 women in the 550-member House of
Representatives reflects the difficulty women face nationwide in
contributing to decision making. Affirmative action advocates
continue to campaign for a minimum 30 percent quota for women in
decision-making positions, but have been unable to ensure its
clear regulation in the law on political parties. -- Ati
Nurbaiti