Demystifying globalization

Demystifying globalization

Moch. N. Kurniawan, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta

Lexus dan Pohon Zaitun : Memahami Globalisasi;
(Original title, Lexus and The Olive Tree: Understanding
Globalization); By Thomas L. Friedman; ITB, 2002; 496pp

Globalization may not be the most frequent word people say in the
world but there is no doubt that it greatly affects the lives of
everyone on the planet.

Some come into contact with globalization merely by eating
Western fast food while others feel its presence when using the
Internet.

Noted journalist Thomas L. Friedman describes the
globalization phenomenon in this book.

He writes that globalization is the only major system
subsisting since the end of the Cold War. It has one overarching
feature: integration. This makes it different from the Cold War,
which was characterized by divisions between countries.

Globalization is also characterized by a single word: the web,
or network, which is greatly assisted by the presence of the
Internet. The Internet symbolizes the connecting of people so as
to allow them to do many things ranging from stock transactions,
updating countries' situations or even organizing a worldwide
strike.

Friedman writes that countries, global markets and individuals
have built the power structure in globalization, replacing the
bipolar structure between the U.S. and Soviet Union during the
Cold War.

The power of the global market could be seen at play in the
fall of Indonesia's President Soeharto in 1998 when global
players pulled out their money due to a lack of confidence in the
country as a safe haven for investment.

Another example is the fact that a person like Osama bin
Laden, who has money and networks, could declare a war against
the U.S. in the late 1970s, forcing the U.S. to bomb Afghanistan
-- where Osama was believed to be living -- with 75 rockets, each
costing US$1 million. This represents a war between a superperson
versus a superpower country.

Friedman defines globalization as an inexorable integration of
markets, nation states and (information) technology to a degree
that has never been seen before -- in such a way that all
persons, firms and nation states can reach the world farther,
faster and cheaper.

However, there will always be a backlash from those that are
left behind by globalization, such as the poor, tribal groups,
protectionists, labor unions and environmentalists.

These groups express their frustration against globalization
in many ways. Poor people cutting down trees and destroying
forests is one example. Protectionists ask governments to provide
more incentives for local industries while labor unions request
governments to stop importing cheap, but good, products to
protect their own products and keep their inefficient employers
operating, to give but a few examples.

Friedman says that such resistance against globalization will
continue to exist, but each of the interested groups have their
own agendas and are not united, thus rendering them unable to
produce an alternative ideology to globalization.

In other words, globalization is the only choice, something
that countries must adjust to.

Consequently, according to Friedman, the free market must be
accepted along with the values of democracy, transparency,
decentralization and legal certainty.

Friedman gives examples of countries that have succeeded or
failed in adopting these values.

Among the extreme failures are the Soviet Union and Albania.
The Soviet Union failed to develop capitalistic values after the
institution of Glasnost and Perestroika as they contradicted its
long-held communist values.

Meanwhile, Albania misunderstood the values of capitalism
after the communist regime fell. Instead of developing values to
support capitalism, it permitted too much freedom, where
businessmen disrespected the rule of law, refused to pay taxes
and did not care about the people's welfare.

The list of success story is, of course, headed by the U.S.,
to which Friedman devotes one whole chapter of his book.

Many dimensions of life are now dominated by the U.S., from
the expansion of the McDonald's fast-food chain, the currency
markets, to the Internet, which have been accepted worldwide.

But one question remains. Why does Friedman choose the title
Lexus and the Olive Tree : Understanding Globalization.

Lexus is actually a luxury car manufacturer in Japan with 310
robots as its mechanical "workers", and a mere 66 flesh-and-blood
workers. The robots work 24 hours a day, and are more productive,
more accurate and more efficient than human beings.

Lexus is a symbol of modernization and increasing living
standards where everyone needs comfort, automation, less work,
and more leisure and wealth. Lexus is everyone's dream.

Meanwhile, the olive tree symbolizes uniqueness or
distinctiveness, which by nature goes against globalization, a
process that tends to make life uniform.

It represents a place where citizens can express their
uniqueness so as to earn the respect of others, without fear of
doing something wrong.

As an example, Friedman points to the people of Norway, one of
the wealthiest countries in Europe, whose people refused to join
the European Union as they felt they would loose much of their
identity. The Norwegians also refused to adopt the Euro single
currency.

They are sure they can continue to grow given their vast oil
reserves, without the EU. Their country may be a little bit
lacking in transparency and be somewhat less efficient, but the
Norwegians are proud as they can continue to use their unique
currency and other national symbols.

In the globalization era, the olive tree is the opponent of
the Lexus, and manifests itself in movements like
environmentalism, protectionism, tribalism and nationalism.

This book gives us inspiration, solutions and an understanding
of how the world works now.

A lesson that is relevant to Indonesia is the destruction of
rain forests in Brazil. Just like people here, many people in
Brazil cut down trees arbitrarily as they had no jobs or other
sources of livelihood.

A U.S. politician, Keith Alger, came to an area in Brazil
intending to educate loggers so as to stop the illegal logging.
But his efforts were not good enough.

He then changed his strategy into taking legal action against
the loggers and creating jobs for them.

For seven years, Alger and friends fought the loggers with the
result that ultimately all logging was banned by the government
of Brazil.

He then contacted his friends in the U.S. to encourage them to
invest in ecotourism, a move that successfully saved the forests
and created jobs for the locals.

When will Indonesia adopt a similar approach?

This book is a rich source of new information and lucid
explanations, making it very valuable reading for understanding
better the complexity of globalization.

The translation of the book also avoids giving rise to
problems in attempting to understand the main message of
globalization.

However, some may dislike the book, saying it is merely a
propaganda tool for globalization, one which fails to offer any
alternative ideologies.