Constitutional Court defends 'controversial' tax tribunal

Constitutional Court defends 'controversial' tax tribunal

Rendi A. Witular, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta

The Constitutional Court ruled on Monday that the Tax Tribunal
was constitutional, dismissing the petition from a local
businessman for the dissolution of the agency.

The ruling came in a four-to-three split with four of the
seven judges of the Court maintaining there was no evidence
proving that the Law No. 14/2002 on Tax Tribunal was against the
1945 Constitution. Three other judges argued otherwise, calling
for a revision of the law.

The four judges said the Tax Tribunal had functioned
adequately as an independent court where people could expect a
fair trial.

"Claims by the petitioner that the Tax Tribunal could not
function as a fair court, and that it closes doors for taxpayers
in seeking justice are all inaccurate," said Constitutional Court
chief judge Jimly Asshidiqie.

"The petition has been filed because the petitioner cannot
understand tax laws and regulations well enough," said Jimly.

The petition was filed by businessman Cornelio Moningka Vega
and his father BQ Vega. They claimed that the Tax Tribunal could
never be independent since it was dependent on the finance
ministry for various aspects. The ministry, for instance, pays
the salaries of the tribunal's judges and decides their
promotions.

Moreover, they said, unlike other courts, people cannot appeal
any decisions made by the tribunal. The decision is considered
final.

Under the Tax Tribunal Law, in order to file a suit at the
tribunal, taxpayers have first to pay the tax office 50 percent
of their arrears. Those who are unable to meet the requirement
would mostly compromise with tax officials and pay them bribes to
settle the dispute over the amount of their taxes.

Three of the seven judges said in their dissenting opinion
that the obligation for taxpayers to pay 50 percent of arrears
before going to the Tax Tribunal has denied them the right of
getting court justice and defending themselves against possible
mistakes made by tax officials.

The judges are Laica Marzuki, Mukhtie Fadjar and Maruarar
Siahaan.

The panel of judges noted, however, that the Tax Tribunal
should be reformed to comply with Law No. 4/2004 on judicial
authority and Law No. 5/2004 on the Supreme Court which grants
the Supreme Court the authority to supervise all types of courts.

The panel of judges thus suggested that the supervision of the
tribunal should be transferred to the Supreme Court.

BQ Vega, who attended the final session, regretted the Court's
decision, saying it would encourage tax officials to continue
abusing the tribunal to blackmail taxpayers.

"We regret that most of the judges don't see that the Tax
Tribunal Law has become a source of corruption among tax
officials," said Vega.

Meanwhile, Directorate General of Taxation Hadi Purnomo
welcomed the decision.

"We are grateful for the judges since their decision would
ensure the smooth flow of tax revenue to the state," said Hadi.

Hadi also insisted that the government would not transfer the
supervision of the Tax Tribunal to the Supreme Court.

"The allegation that the Tax Tribunal is used to extort
taxpayers just because it is under the finance ministry is not
true. If there is any abuse (of authority), we urge taxpayers to
report it to the police rather than spreading rumors," he said.