Blind faith

The reactions of Wixey and Policar to Daryadi's letter Declaration of faith (Jan. 22) appear to be further proof of the old adage that science and religion do not mix. On the surface, it would appear that scientists and religious believers are destined to be eternally opposed to each other. The Latin words scientia meaning knowledge, and religion, implying reverence or homage, seem to emphasize the fundamental difference between the two: one deals in facts, the other in faith.

In the past, both scientists and the religious fraternity have been equally to blame for their blind faith. Recently, however, both seem to be moderating these positions. It seems that more and more scientists are openly admitting the shortcomings of science in explaining many of life's most fundamental questions. Likewise, many western leaders have been taking the lead in disputing some of the Bible's assertions. Indeed, in the West, it is hard to find people who are still adamant that the universe was created in seven days, or that God created woman from a man's rib. Even the Moslem community, in this age of emancipation, is starting to frown on the validity of a man being allowed four wives.

I believe that such questioning of one's traditional beliefs should not be stifled but actively encouraged. Indeed, it is a person or community's "blind faith" which is counterproductive, negative and dangerous. Blind faith can lead to disputes, discord and conflict. And it is sad that this blind faith is allowed to play such an important role in the lives of ordinary people. Far from seeking to explore, question and dispute their own and others' beliefs, whether scientific, religious or otherwise, they adopt a position of blind acceptance. But is it in fact themselves who curiously strive for conformity, or is it perhaps the "powers that be" who bludgeon them into doing so?

Curiosity is a fundamental part of the human character. From the day we learn to crawl, we are constantly seeking, experimenting and discovering. This process of discovery is one which should last a lifetime. To have it curtailed must surely constitute a heinous violation of human rights. Yet, from the moment our children enter kindergarten, this is precisely what happens.

Conformity takes precedence over independence of mind. Acceptance is more desirable than inquisitiveness. Imitation is rewarded more than imagination. Until the situation is rectified by radically rethinking the objectives of religion for the education of the nation's citizens, this country will continue to fail to realize its true potential. The "blind faith" of its populace will continue to be the order of the day and real development -- not condominiums, national cars and nuclear power plants, but human, mental and spiritual development -- will remain nothing more than an elusive dream.

BEN DOWSON

Jakarta